aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical bottleneck in AI-driven robotics by systematically characterizing why Large Language Models fail when generating policy code for physical manipulation tasks. By identifying specific failure modes linked to task complexity and instruction granularity, the study offers actionable insights for improving the reliability of LLM-based robotic agents through targeted refinement techniques. The findings are essential for advancing safe and robust deployment of autonomous robots in real-world environments where precise control is non-negotiable.
RoboInspector: Unveiling the Unreliability of Policy Code for LLM-enabled Robotic Manipulation
arXiv:2508.21378v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in reasoning and code generation, enabling robotic manipulation to be initiated with just a single instruction. The LLM carries out various tasks by generating policy code required to control the robot. Despite advances in LLMs, achieving reliable policy code generation remains a significant challenge due to the diverse requirements of real-world tasks and the inherent complexity of user instructions. In practice, different users may provide distinct instructions to drive the robot for the same task, which may cause the unreliability of policy code generation. To bridge this gap, we design \textbf{RoboInspector}, a pipeline to unveil and characterize the unreliability of the policy code for LLM-enabled robotic manipulation from two perspectives: the complexity of the manipulation task and the granularity of the instruction. We perform comprehensive experiments with 216 distinct combinations of tasks, instructions, and LLMs in two prominent frameworks. The \textbf{RoboInspector} identifies four main unreliable behaviors that lead to manipulation failure. We provide a detailed characterization of these behaviors and their underlying causes, giving insight for practical development to reduce unreliability. Furthermore, we introduce a refinement approach guided by failure policy code feedback that improves the reliability of policy code generation by up to 35\% in LLM-enabled robotic manipulation, evaluated in both simulation and real-world environments.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in reasoning and code generation, enabling robotic manipulation to be initiated with just a single instruction. The LLM carries out various tasks by generating policy code required to control the robot. Despite advances in LLMs, achieving reliable policy code generation remains a significant challenge due to the diverse requirements of real-world tasks and the inherent complexity of user instructions. In practice, different users may provide distinct instructions to drive the robot for the same task, which may cause the unreliability of policy code generation. To bridge this gap, we design \textbf{RoboInspector}, a pipeline to unveil and characterize the unreliability of the policy code for LLM-enabled robotic manipulation from two perspectives: the complexity of the manipulation task and the granularity of the instruction. We perform comprehensive experiments with 216 distinct combinations of tasks, instructions, and LLMs in two prominent frameworks. The \textbf{RoboInspector} identifies four main unreliable behaviors that lead to manipulation failure. We provide a detailed characterization of these behaviors and their underlying causes, giving insight for practical development to reduce unreliability. Furthermore, we introduce a refinement approach guided by failure policy code feedback that improves the reliability of policy code generation by up to 35\% in LLM-enabled robotic manipulation, evaluated in both simulation and real-world environments.
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2508.21378 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2508.21378v2 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.21378 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 307 words
Related coverage

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026

The Machines that Make the Machines
NVIDIA · Oct 7, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
When to Switch: Reliable Action-Chunk Extension for Vision-Language-Action Models
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026