Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical gap in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models by introducing RoboFAC, a framework specifically designed for diagnosing and correcting robotic manipulation failures rather than just executing successful tasks. By leveraging a large-scale dataset of erroneous trajectories, the proposed lightweight multimodal model outperforms GPT-4o in failure analysis accuracy and significantly improves robustness in real-world control pipelines. The work advances the field by shifting focus from pure success-rate optimization to systematic error recovery, which is essential for deploying autonomous robots in open environments.
Sources coveringarXiv, AWS, Databricks, InfoQ
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

RoboFAC: A Comprehensive Framework for Robotic Failure Analysis and Correction

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2505.12224v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have recently advanced robotic manipulation by translating natural-language instructions and visual observations into control actions. However, existing VLAs are primarily trained on successful expert demonstrations and lack structured supervision for failure diagnosis and recovery, limiting robustness in open-world scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose the Robotic Failure Analysis and Correction (RoboFAC) framework. We construct a large-scale failure-centric dataset comprising 9,440 erroneous manipulation trajectories and 78,623 QA pairs across 53 scenes in both simulation and real-world environments, with systematically categorized failure types. Leveraging this dataset, we develop a lightweight multimodal model specialized for task understanding, failure analysis, and failure correction, enabling efficient local deployment while remaining competitive with large proprietary models. Experimental results demonstrate that RoboFAC achieves a 34.1% higher failure analysis accuracy compared to GPT-4o. Furthermore, we integrated RoboFAC as an external supervisor in a real-world VLA control pipeline, yielding a 29.1% relative improvement across four tasks while significantly reducing latency relative to GPT-4o. These results demonstrate that RoboFAC enables systematic failure diagnosis and recovery, significantly enhancing VLA recovery capabilities. Our model and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/MINT-SJTU/RoboFAC.

Abstract:Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have recently advanced robotic manipulation by translating natural-language instructions and visual observations into control actions. However, existing VLAs are primarily trained on successful expert demonstrations and lack structured supervision for failure diagnosis and recovery, limiting robustness in open-world scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose the Robotic Failure Analysis and Correction (RoboFAC) framework. We construct a large-scale failure-centric dataset comprising 9,440 erroneous manipulation trajectories and 78,623 QA pairs across 53 scenes in both simulation and real-world environments, with systematically categorized failure types. Leveraging this dataset, we develop a lightweight multimodal model specialized for task understanding, failure analysis, and failure correction, enabling efficient local deployment while remaining competitive with large proprietary models. Experimental results demonstrate that RoboFAC achieves a 34.1% higher failure analysis accuracy compared to GPT-4o. Furthermore, we integrated RoboFAC as an external supervisor in a real-world VLA control pipeline, yielding a 29.1% relative improvement across four tasks while significantly reducing latency relative to GPT-4o. These results demonstrate that RoboFAC enables systematic failure diagnosis and recovery, significantly enhancing VLA recovery capabilities. Our model and dataset are publicly available at this https URL.

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2505.12224 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2505.12224v5 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.12224 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words

Related coverage