Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research provides a theoretical framework for understanding the optimization landscape of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) on algorithmic reasoning tasks. By mapping RLVR dynamics to spin-glass models, the study demonstrates that the landscapes are generally benign and free of trapping local minima, attributing training difficulties instead to gradient estimation errors and diffusive barriers. These insights suggest that strategic adjustments to entropy regulators can effectively mitigate these obstacles, facilitating the learning of complex algorithmic chains of thought in transformers.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

RLVR landscapes for iterated multiplications can be benign: Insights from spin-glass theory

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.28625v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite the importance of reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), the extent to which it can learn new reasoning capabilities remains debated. Here we study the optimization landscape of RLVR on algorithmic tasks, such as iterated group and quasigroup multiplication. To this end, we map entropy-regularized RLVR over myopic tabular policies onto an energy-based (spin-glass) model over deterministic policies. This mapping upper-bounds what RLVR can achieve, and lets us rigorously characterize the landscape in this tabular setting. We show, both theoretically and experimentally, that for a wide class of models and tasks with uncorrelated inputs, this landscape is benign, containing no local minima that could trap RLVR training. Rather, the practical difficulty of these tasks appears to stem, at least in part, from issues such as diffusive barriers and gradient-estimation error in traversing the landscape. These are genuine obstacles that can prevent a solution from being found, but they are distinct from the landscape itself being rugged. We show that these obstacles can often be mitigated through the choice of entropy regulator. Consistent with this theory, we find that a transformer trained from scratch, using only last-token rewards, successfully learns an algorithmic chain of thought for iterated non-Abelian group multiplications.

Abstract:Despite the importance of reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), the extent to which it can learn new reasoning capabilities remains debated. Here we study the optimization landscape of RLVR on algorithmic tasks, such as iterated group and quasigroup multiplication. To this end, we map entropy-regularized RLVR over myopic tabular policies onto an energy-based (spin-glass) model over deterministic policies. This mapping upper-bounds what RLVR can achieve, and lets us rigorously characterize the landscape in this tabular setting. We show, both theoretically and experimentally, that for a wide class of models and tasks with uncorrelated inputs, this landscape is benign, containing no local minima that could trap RLVR training. Rather, the practical difficulty of these tasks appears to stem, at least in part, from issues such as diffusive barriers and gradient-estimation error in traversing the landscape. These are genuine obstacles that can prevent a solution from being found, but they are distinct from the landscape itself being rugged. We show that these obstacles can often be mitigated through the choice of entropy regulator. Consistent with this theory, we find that a transformer trained from scratch, using only last-token rewards, successfully learns an algorithmic chain of thought for iterated non-Abelian group multiplications.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Disordered Systems and Neural Networks (cond-mat.dis-nn); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2609.28625 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.28625v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28625 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words

Related coverage