aiqbench analysis
RL-FAT addresses a critical blind spot in adversarial training where standard methods boost average robustness while leaving specific classes disproportionately vulnerable. By integrating reinforcement learning to dynamically prioritize weak categories, this framework successfully balances robustness across all image classes without sacrificing overall accuracy. This approach offers a more equitable defense mechanism for deep neural networks facing targeted attacks.
RL-FAT: Reinforcement Learning for Fair Adversarial Training
arXiv:2608.29247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep neural networks remain highly vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, and adversarial training (AT) has become a widely used approach for improving robustness. However, improvements in average robust accuracy often mask substantial class-wise disparities: while some classes become more robust, others may remain disproportionately vulnerable under attack. This imbalance raises an important adversarial fairness concern, particularly in vision tasks where reliable robustness is expected across all categories. To address this challenge, we propose \textbf{RL-FAT}, a reinforcement-learning-inspired fair adversarial training framework that uses policy-gradient based feedback from adversarial predictions. RL-FAT interprets the prediction distribution as a policy and combines correctness-based prediction rewards with class-wise value estimates to compute class-specific advantages for policy-gradient optimization. This enables the model to adaptively focus on class-wise misclassification. Furthermore, we introduce a fairness-emphasis adversarial loss that assigns stronger training pressure to classes with high adversarial loss, thereby mitigating class-wise robustness disparity. By combining reinforcement-driven adaptation with fairness-emphasis regularization, RL-FAT improves adversarial robustness while promoting a more balanced robustness distribution across classes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves competitive robust accuracy and substantially reduces class-wise robustness imbalance compared with standard adversarial training baselines.
Abstract:Deep neural networks remain highly vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, and adversarial training (AT) has become a widely used approach for improving robustness. However, improvements in average robust accuracy often mask substantial class-wise disparities: while some classes become more robust, others may remain disproportionately vulnerable under attack. This imbalance raises an important adversarial fairness concern, particularly in vision tasks where reliable robustness is expected across all categories. To address this challenge, we propose \textbf{RL-FAT}, a reinforcement-learning-inspired fair adversarial training framework that uses policy-gradient based feedback from adversarial predictions. RL-FAT interprets the prediction distribution as a policy and combines correctness-based prediction rewards with class-wise value estimates to compute class-specific advantages for policy-gradient optimization. This enables the model to adaptively focus on class-wise misclassification. Furthermore, we introduce a fairness-emphasis adversarial loss that assigns stronger training pressure to classes with high adversarial loss, thereby mitigating class-wise robustness disparity. By combining reinforcement-driven adaptation with fairness-emphasis regularization, RL-FAT improves adversarial robustness while promoting a more balanced robustness distribution across classes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves competitive robust accuracy and substantially reduces class-wise robustness imbalance compared with standard adversarial training baselines.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.29247 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.29247v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29247 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words
Related coverage

Continual learning might make your blocking monitors nearly useless
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 24, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026

Microsoft AI CEO says AI threats are real, and Anthropic is making it worse
The Verge · Sep 17, 2026

OpenAI's myopia just keeps causing alignment problems
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026