aiqbench analysis
This paper applies distributional reinforcement learning, specifically a QR-DQN agent with a mean-variance objective, to choosing which satellites to inspect in a low-Earth-orbit servicing campaign. The main result is that a single risk-aversion weight traces out a trade-off between mean return and return variance, and that the risk-averse policies roughly halve return variance and reduce mission-loss probability at some cost in mean return. For ML readers, the useful points are the risk-sensitive use of learned return distributions and the efficient-frontier validation, though the evidence rests on simulated scenarios with five targets.
Risk-Sensitive Mission Planning for Multi-Target On-Orbit Inspection via Distributional Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2610.41647v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-target on-orbit servicing missions require planning tools that can adapt to evolving operational conditions while accounting for the outcome variability inherent to safety-critical spaceflight. This paper presents an adaptive planning approach for multi-target servicing campaigns in low Earth orbit and applies it to inspection missions flown by a low-thrust servicer. The approach is based on Distributional Reinforcement Learning, which learns the full distribution of mission returns and thereby supports explicit risk-sensitive decision-making at each planning step. Specifically, a Quantile-Regression Deep Q-Network (QR-DQN) agent selects which target to inspect next by jointly considering the expectation and the variance of the predicted return through a mean-variance criterion. The mission environment models circular orbits with a spread in inclination and uses Edelbaum's combined-manoeuvre low-thrust transfer estimates. The observation comprises the orbital elements, the visit history, the observed risk state of each target and the remaining mission-time budget. The risk state of each target changes stochastically during the campaign, making the outcome of an inspection uncertain and creating operationally meaningful distinctions between risk-neutral and risk-averse planning strategies. Because the mission-time budget generally admits only a subset of the candidate targets, the planner must also select which targets to inspect. Numerical experiments on scenarios with five target satellites show that one risk-aversion weight moves the policy across a range of mean return and return variance, over an unchanged environment and reward. Risk-averse agents reduce the variance of the episodic return by approximately one half relative to risk-neutral agents and lower the probability of a mission loss, at a cost in mean return. To validate the learned policies, the efficient frontier, which gives the highest mean return attainable at each level of return variance, is computed exactly by enumerating the admissible visit orders. At equal variance, the learned policies lie close to this frontier in mean return, and the risk-averse policies have a lower probability of a mission loss than the frontier policies.
Abstract:Multi-target on-orbit servicing missions require planning tools that can adapt to evolving operational conditions while accounting for the outcome variability inherent to safety-critical spaceflight. This paper presents an adaptive planning approach for multi-target servicing campaigns in low Earth orbit and applies it to inspection missions flown by a low-thrust servicer. The approach is based on Distributional Reinforcement Learning, which learns the full distribution of mission returns and thereby supports explicit risk-sensitive decision-making at each planning step. Specifically, a Quantile-Regression Deep Q-Network (QR-DQN) agent selects which target to inspect next by jointly considering the expectation and the variance of the predicted return through a mean-variance criterion. The mission environment models circular orbits with a spread in inclination and uses Edelbaum's combined-manoeuvre low-thrust transfer estimates. The observation comprises the orbital elements, the visit history, the observed risk state of each target and the remaining mission-time budget. The risk state of each target changes stochastically during the campaign, making the outcome of an inspection uncertain and creating operationally meaningful distinctions between risk-neutral and risk-averse planning strategies. Because the mission-time budget generally admits only a subset of the candidate targets, the planner must also select which targets to inspect. Numerical experiments on scenarios with five target satellites show that one risk-aversion weight moves the policy across a range of mean return and return variance, over an unchanged environment and reward. Risk-averse agents reduce the variance of the episodic return by approximately one half relative to risk-neutral agents and lower the probability of a mission loss, at a cost in mean return. To validate the learned policies, the efficient frontier, which gives the highest mean return attainable at each level of return variance, is computed exactly by enumerating the admissible visit orders. At equal variance, the learned policies lie close to this frontier in mean return, and the risk-averse policies have a lower probability of a mission loss than the frontier policies.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2610.41647 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.41647v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41647 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 415 words