aiqbench analysis
This research investigates how reinforcement learning reward signals can be sourced internally from model attention mechanisms versus externally from verifiers to enhance physical reasoning in Vision-Language Models. The study demonstrates that while external rewards drive the majority of accuracy gains, an internal attention-based reward serves as a complementary, annotation-free signal that specifically improves spatial-relation reasoning and generalization without added cost.
Reward Design for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2604.13993v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Physical reasoning over images requires integrating perception, domain knowledge, and multi-step symbolic inference, yet Vision-Language Models (VLMs) fall far short of human performance on physics benchmarks. Reinforcement learning can improve reasoning via reward signals, but it remains unclear whether these signals must come from outside the model or can be derived from the model itself. We compare external rewards, which rely on an outside verifier (rule-based format and answer-correctness checks, or an LLM-judge rubric), with an internal attention-based reward computed from the model's own attention over image regions, requiring no labels or judge. We find that external rewards drive most of the accuracy gains, while preserving more coherent reasoning when rewarded for reasoning tokens. The internal attention-based reward, provides an annotation-free grounding signal that improves spatial-relation reasoning and is complementary to external rewards: adding it to format and accuracy rewards, at no additional annotation cost, improves average accuracy on Molmo~2 while generalizing to out-of-distribution tasks. Our results suggest that internal attention rewards can supplement external supervision and lead to improved physical reasoning.
Abstract:Physical reasoning over images requires integrating perception, domain knowledge, and multi-step symbolic inference, yet Vision-Language Models (VLMs) fall far short of human performance on physics benchmarks. Reinforcement learning can improve reasoning via reward signals, but it remains unclear whether these signals must come from outside the model or can be derived from the model itself. We compare external rewards, which rely on an outside verifier (rule-based format and answer-correctness checks, or an LLM-judge rubric), with an internal attention-based reward computed from the model's own attention over image regions, requiring no labels or judge. We find that external rewards drive most of the accuracy gains, while preserving more coherent reasoning when rewarded for reasoning tokens. The internal attention-based reward, provides an annotation-free grounding signal that improves spatial-relation reasoning and is complementary to external rewards: adding it to format and accuracy rewards, at no additional annotation cost, improves average accuracy on Molmo~2 while generalizing to out-of-distribution tasks. Our results suggest that internal attention rewards can supplement external supervision and lead to improved physical reasoning.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2604.13993 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2604.13993v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.13993 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words
Related coverage
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · Sep 14, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026