Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses a methodological flaw in computational psycholinguistics where unigram surprisal is estimated from independent corpus counts rather than the same language model used for contextual surprisal, potentially introducing significant estimation errors. The authors propose a unified Monte Carlo framework to derive both metrics from a single model, demonstrating that this approach alters the predictive contribution of these features to reading time and confirms frequency as a dominant predictor of processing effort.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Revisiting the Estimation of Unigram Surprisal in Computational Psycholinguistics

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.18414v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Contextual and unigram surprisal are standard predictors of reading time in computational psycholinguistics. While contextual surprisal is typically derived from neural language models, unigram surprisal is usually obtained from independent corpus counts. Although both quantities are deterministic functionals of a single underlying distribution---capturing conditional and marginal structure respectively---this practice breaks their probabilistic link and may introduce estimation error from the mismatch. We propose three principles for estimating unigram surprisal in psycholinguistic research, including the requirement that both quantities be derived from the same language model. We operationalize this principle by introducing a Monte Carlo estimator of unigram surprisal from a language model, along with a marginalized variant that has lower variance empirically. When unigram surprisal is re-estimated under this unified framework, we find evidence that predictors change in their predictive contribution to reading time. We also confirm prior findings that frequency can be a stronger predictor of processing effort than contextual surprisal under this unified framework.

Abstract:Contextual and unigram surprisal are standard predictors of reading time in computational psycholinguistics. While contextual surprisal is typically derived from neural language models, unigram surprisal is usually obtained from independent corpus counts. Although both quantities are deterministic functionals of a single underlying distribution---capturing conditional and marginal structure respectively---this practice breaks their probabilistic link and may introduce estimation error from the mismatch. We propose three principles for estimating unigram surprisal in psycholinguistic research, including the requirement that both quantities be derived from the same language model. We operationalize this principle by introducing a Monte Carlo estimator of unigram surprisal from a language model, along with a marginalized variant that has lower variance empirically. When unigram surprisal is re-estimated under this unified framework, we find evidence that predictors change in their predictive contribution to reading time. We also confirm prior findings that frequency can be a stronger predictor of processing effort than contextual surprisal under this unified framework.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.18414 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.18414v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18414 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words

Related coverage