aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical edge case in computer vision by introducing the Celeb Twins Test Set (CTTS) to evaluate how well deep CNNs distinguish between monozygotic twins using subtle features like skin marks and asymmetry. The study reveals that current models fail to leverage these distinguishing characteristics, highlighting a gap in training data representation for identical pairs. Additionally, it explores the potential of generative AI tools to synthesize additional twin images, thereby expanding datasets to improve recognition accuracy without relying solely on scarce real-world examples.
Revisiting Face Recognition for Monozygotic Twins: The Celeb Twins Test Set
arXiv:2609.01141v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Past literature on face recognition for monozygotic (("identical") twins points to facial marks and mirror asymmetry as possible directions for improved accuracy of twins recognition. The Celeb Twins Test Set (CTTS) contains web-scraped image pairs for 80 sets of celebrity twins. It is the only twins test set with meta-data for twins with distinguishing skin marks and possible mirror asymmetry. CTTS is organized in the manner of face verification test sets such as LFW, CALFW, CPLFW, CFP-FP, and AgeDB-30. Current deep CNN matchers can achieve over 76% accuracy in classifying CTTS same-person / different-person image pairs. We show that current matchers do not make use of skin marks, or asymmetry, and discuss reasons for this. Finally, we discuss the feasibility of using generative AI tools such as Grok, ChatGPT and Gemini to create images of imagined monozygotic twins as a means to increase representation of twins in face recognition training sets.
Abstract:Past literature on face recognition for monozygotic (("identical") twins points to facial marks and mirror asymmetry as possible directions for improved accuracy of twins recognition. The Celeb Twins Test Set (CTTS) contains web-scraped image pairs for 80 sets of celebrity twins. It is the only twins test set with meta-data for twins with distinguishing skin marks and possible mirror asymmetry. CTTS is organized in the manner of face verification test sets such as LFW, CALFW, CPLFW, CFP-FP, and AgeDB-30. Current deep CNN matchers can achieve over 76% accuracy in classifying CTTS same-person / different-person image pairs. We show that current matchers do not make use of skin marks, or asymmetry, and discuss reasons for this. Finally, we discuss the feasibility of using generative AI tools such as Grok, ChatGPT and Gemini to create images of imagined monozygotic twins as a means to increase representation of twins in face recognition training sets.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.01141 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.01141v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01141 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words
Related coverage

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026
Physiological Signals as a Forensic Modality for Talking-Face Deepfake Detection
arXiv · Jul 27, 2026

3D movies are finally worth watching
The Verge · Oct 3, 2026

Surprise! Facial recognition smart locks are actually good
The Verge · Jul 18, 2026