aiqbench analysis
This arXiv preprint studies how chain-of-thought reasoning should be used in vision-language-action models for robot control. Its main claims are that reasoning helps mainly when it is grounded in concrete action guidance, and that autoregressive CoT inference accumulates errors, which its CoT-dropout training is meant to avoid. The reported gains (86.9% on LIBERO-Plus, 53.2% on VLABench) are self-reported benchmark results, so readers should wait for independent replication before treating the scaling claims as settled.
Revisiting Embodied Chain-of-Thought for Generalizable Robot Manipulation
arXiv:2606.03784v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Embodied chain-of-thought (CoT) aims to bridge linguistic reasoning with robotic control, yet its effective form and integration remain underexplored. In this paper, we revisit embodied CoT for robotic control at an unprecedented scale. We curate the largest embodied CoT corpus to date, comprising 978,743 trajectories, 226.3M samples, and 2592.5 hours of data. Through extensive experiments, we show that effective CoT must ground high-level semantic understaning in concrete linguistic action guidance -- such as end-effector movement and image-space trajectories -- whereas high-level reasoning alone yields marginal gains. More importantly, we identify that explicit CoT does not scale reliably as an autoregressive action prefix, suffering from compounding errors during inference. To address these challenges, we propose ERVLA, a vision-language-action (VLA) model that effectively leverages linguistic reasoning in generalizable robot manipulation. ERVLA is trained using a CoT-dropout strategy, allowing the model to leverage rich reasoning traces during training while predicting actions directly without CoT during inference to bypass autoregressive instability. This approach enables reliable scaling with increasing pre-training data. ERVLA achieves state-of-the-art results on LIBERO-Plus with an 86.9\% success rate and reaches 53.2\% on VLABench, showcasing superior performance in out-of-distribution settings. Furthermore, ERVLA outperforms competitive state-of-the-art baselines in real-robot experiments, especially in handling semantic ambiguity and long-horizon tasks. Code, data, and model checkpoints are available on the project website: https://taoshuaiz.github.io/ERVLA/.
Abstract:Embodied chain-of-thought (CoT) aims to bridge linguistic reasoning with robotic control, yet its effective form and integration remain underexplored. In this paper, we revisit embodied CoT for robotic control at an unprecedented scale. We curate the largest embodied CoT corpus to date, comprising 978,743 trajectories, 226.3M samples, and 2592.5 hours of data. Through extensive experiments, we show that effective CoT must ground high-level semantic understaning in concrete linguistic action guidance -- such as end-effector movement and image-space trajectories -- whereas high-level reasoning alone yields marginal gains. More importantly, we identify that explicit CoT does not scale reliably as an autoregressive action prefix, suffering from compounding errors during inference. To address these challenges, we propose ERVLA, a vision-language-action (VLA) model that effectively leverages linguistic reasoning in generalizable robot manipulation. ERVLA is trained using a CoT-dropout strategy, allowing the model to leverage rich reasoning traces during training while predicting actions directly without CoT during inference to bypass autoregressive instability. This approach enables reliable scaling with increasing pre-training data. ERVLA achieves state-of-the-art results on LIBERO-Plus with an 86.9\% success rate and reaches 53.2\% on VLABench, showcasing superior performance in out-of-distribution settings. Furthermore, ERVLA outperforms competitive state-of-the-art baselines in real-robot experiments, especially in handling semantic ambiguity and long-horizon tasks. Code, data, and model checkpoints are available on the project website: this https URL.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2606.03784 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2606.03784v3 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03784 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words
Related coverage
Revisiting Embodied Chain-of-Thought for Generalizable Robot Manipulation
arXiv · Jun 4, 2026
Revisiting Embodied Chain-of-Thought for Generalizable Robot Manipulation
arXiv · Jun 3, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026