Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

ReviewPilot applies a conversational multi-agent LLM pipeline to PRISMA-style systematic reviews, with a focus on auditability: each screening exclusion carries a reason and each extracted value is linked to its source. The reported gains (screening macro F1 up to 0.776, extraction F1 up to 0.788) are measured on epidemiological reviews against a single-prompt LLM and AgentSLR, with biomedicine and HCI case studies only loosely supporting transfer. Readers should weigh those numbers against the limited domain coverage, but the traceability design is a useful pattern for high-stakes LLM-assisted research.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ReviewPilot: A Multi-Agent System for Screening and Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.21042v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Systematic literature reviews follow the PRISMA process of screening scholarly works and extracting evidence from included studies. Deep research tools based on large language models (LLMs) can search and summarize the literature but do not record which studies are excluded or where extracted values come from. We develop a conversational multi-agent system called ReviewPilot that automates the PRISMA workflow from paper screening to information extraction. Researchers can tailor criteria and schemas through dialogue, and a project memory keeps their configurations and revisions. Each screening decision comes with its reason and each extracted value with its source. On epidemiological expert reviews, ReviewPilot outperforms a single-prompt LLM and AgentSLR across three LLMs, with screening macro F1 up to 0.776 and extraction F1 up to 0.788. Case studies in biomedicine and human-computer interaction show close agreement with human annotators, suggesting that ReviewPilot can transfer beyond epidemiology. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhaoqianXue/ReviewPilot.

Abstract:Systematic literature reviews follow the PRISMA process of screening scholarly works and extracting evidence from included studies. Deep research tools based on large language models (LLMs) can search and summarize the literature but do not record which studies are excluded or where extracted values come from. We develop a conversational multi-agent system called ReviewPilot that automates the PRISMA workflow from paper screening to information extraction. Researchers can tailor criteria and schemas through dialogue, and a project memory keeps their configurations and revisions. Each screening decision comes with its reason and each extracted value with its source. On epidemiological expert reviews, ReviewPilot outperforms a single-prompt LLM and AgentSLR across three LLMs, with screening macro F1 up to 0.776 and extraction F1 up to 0.788. Case studies in biomedicine and human-computer interaction show close agreement with human annotators, suggesting that ReviewPilot can transfer beyond epidemiology. Code is available at this https URL.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2610.21042 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.21042v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21042 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words

Related coverage