aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces ReuF2F, a novel benchmark using 244 formalized open problems from undergraduate research to rigorously evaluate coding agents in Lean 4. The study highlights a significant gap in current capabilities, finding that even top models successfully resolve only about 40% of these entry-level mathematical challenges. This work is critical for advancing the reliability and verification standards of AI systems tackling complex formal reasoning tasks.
ReuF2F: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Formalized Undergraduate Research Problems
arXiv:2610.27046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI systems begin to resolve open research problems, reliable verification becomes increasingly important. Formal mathematics provides a trusted framework for mathematical reasoning, enabling agents to produce machine-checkable proofs while conducting mathematical exploration. Existing formal mathematics benchmarks often focus on known results or a small set of prominent open problems, which can become difficult to evaluate reliably once solutions are discovered and widely disseminated. Existing evaluation protocols are also not always aligned with how modern coding agents operate. We therefore introduce ReuF2F, a Lean 4 benchmark of 244 formalized open problems drawn from Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU), spanning entry-level open research problems across a broad range of mathematical subfields. We expect these less prominent open problems, which tend to attract less attention and may remain unsolved for longer, to be better suited for held-out evaluation of end-to-end open problem resolution in Lean. We adopt a standard coding-agent evaluation setting, placing each problem and its logical negation into a Lean project in a Docker container. We also build Leanimum-agent on mini-SWE-agent to provide a unified harness for fair comparisons across models. Our evaluation finds that even the best-performing model resolves only ~40% of the problems, leaving substantial room for improvement on formalized open research problems.
Abstract:As AI systems begin to resolve open research problems, reliable verification becomes increasingly important. Formal mathematics provides a trusted framework for mathematical reasoning, enabling agents to produce machine-checkable proofs while conducting mathematical exploration. Existing formal mathematics benchmarks often focus on known results or a small set of prominent open problems, which can become difficult to evaluate reliably once solutions are discovered and widely disseminated. Existing evaluation protocols are also not always aligned with how modern coding agents operate. We therefore introduce ReuF2F, a Lean 4 benchmark of 244 formalized open problems drawn from Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU), spanning entry-level open research problems across a broad range of mathematical subfields. We expect these less prominent open problems, which tend to attract less attention and may remain unsolved for longer, to be better suited for held-out evaluation of end-to-end open problem resolution in Lean. We adopt a standard coding-agent evaluation setting, placing each problem and its logical negation into a Lean project in a Docker container. We also build Leanimum-agent on mini-SWE-agent to provide a unified harness for fair comparisons across models. Our evaluation finds that even the best-performing model resolves only ~40% of the problems, leaving substantial room for improvement on formalized open research problems.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.27046 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.27046v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.27046 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words
Related coverage
SocraticPO: Policy Optimization via Interactive Guidance
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026
SocraticPO: Policy Optimization via Interactive Guidance
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026
MathAdv: What Theorem Provers Know, Reason, Formalize, and Generalize
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026
AdvancedMathBench: A Benchmark Suite for Advanced Mathematical Proof Generation and Verification
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026