Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates that dense retrieval systems inherently bias results toward the political ideology and dialect present in user queries, exacerbating polarization and health disparities for speakers of African American Language. By proving these biases exist beyond surface vocabulary through embedding analysis, the study highlights a critical vulnerability in current AI infrastructure where identity signals directly influence information access. Addressing these latent biases is essential to building equitable retrieval models that serve diverse populations without reinforcing societal inequalities.
Sources coveringarXiv, AWS, InfoQ
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Retrieval Sensitivity to Identity Signals in Queries

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.36534v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dense retrievers decide which documents reach users and the language models that use them, yet they are typically evaluated with neutral queries. We ask whether the identity signals that real users express in their queries---political ideology and dialect---bias what a retriever returns. We design evaluations in two domains, political news and consumer-health questions, each pairing a controlled synthetic set that varies only the identity signal with naturalistic queries. Across five dense retrievers and a sparse baseline, every retriever (i) retrieves articles that align with the query's own political lean and (ii) performs worse for questions written in African American Language (AAL) than in White Mainstream English (WME). Two analyses tie these gaps to queries' identity signals beyond surface vocabulary: partialling out an aggregate lexical-asymmetry score leaves the synthetic gaps largely intact, and linear probes recover lean and dialect from the retrievers' query embeddings beyond token-level features. Left unaddressed, such retrieval biases risk contributing to polarization and reinforcing the health disparities already faced by AAL speakers. Code is available at https://github.com/Andrewtcr/bias-ret.

Abstract:Dense retrievers decide which documents reach users and the language models that use them, yet they are typically evaluated with neutral queries. We ask whether the identity signals that real users express in their queries---political ideology and dialect---bias what a retriever returns. We design evaluations in two domains, political news and consumer-health questions, each pairing a controlled synthetic set that varies only the identity signal with naturalistic queries. Across five dense retrievers and a sparse baseline, every retriever (i) retrieves articles that align with the query's own political lean and (ii) performs worse for questions written in African American Language (AAL) than in White Mainstream English (WME). Two analyses tie these gaps to queries' identity signals beyond surface vocabulary: partialling out an aggregate lexical-asymmetry score leaves the synthetic gaps largely intact, and linear probes recover lean and dialect from the retrievers' query embeddings beyond token-level features. Left unaddressed, such retrieval biases risk contributing to polarization and reinforcing the health disparities already faced by AAL speakers. Code is available at this https URL.

EMNLP 2026 camera-ready, with a correction to Fig. 4

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2609.36534 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.36534v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36534 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 283 words

Related coverage