Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Rethinking Total Absorption Gamma Spectroscopy Deconvolution: Supervised Machine Learning vs Response-Matrix Methods
arXiv:2608.00090v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The extraction of $\beta$-feeding distributions in Total Absorption $\gamma$-ray Spectroscopy constitutes a challenging inverse problem, particularly in nuclei with complex decay schemes involving a large number of excited states. In such cases, the measured spectrum arises from the superposition of many detector response functions, making the determination of the individual feedings intrinsically ill-posed and highly sensitive to the methodology employed. In this work, we present a systematic comparison between supervised Machine-Learning techniques and Response-Matrix methods using realistic Monte Carlo simulations of an experimental Total Absorption Spectrometer. Supervised Machine-Learning approaches construct a non-parametric estimator that infers level feedings from the measured spectrum after a training stage, whereas Response-Matrix methods determine the feeding distribution by directly minimizing the difference between measured and reconstructed spectra. Our results show that supervised Machine-Learning techniques achieve superior accuracy in the reconstruction of individual feeding intensities, whereas Response-Matrix methods provide robust and physically consistent initial solutions. These findings support a hybrid strategy in which a Response-Matrix method is first used to obtain an initial feeding estimate, which is then refined using a supervised Machine-Learning approach to achieve improved overall accuracy.
Abstract:The extraction of $\beta$-feeding distributions in Total Absorption $\gamma$-ray Spectroscopy constitutes a challenging inverse problem, particularly in nuclei with complex decay schemes involving a large number of excited states. In such cases, the measured spectrum arises from the superposition of many detector response functions, making the determination of the individual feedings intrinsically ill-posed and highly sensitive to the methodology employed. In this work, we present a systematic comparison between supervised Machine-Learning techniques and Response-Matrix methods using realistic Monte Carlo simulations of an experimental Total Absorption Spectrometer. Supervised Machine-Learning approaches construct a non-parametric estimator that infers level feedings from the measured spectrum after a training stage, whereas Response-Matrix methods determine the feeding distribution by directly minimizing the difference between measured and reconstructed spectra. Our results show that supervised Machine-Learning techniques achieve superior accuracy in the reconstruction of individual feeding intensities, whereas Response-Matrix methods provide robust and physically consistent initial solutions. These findings support a hybrid strategy in which a Response-Matrix method is first used to obtain an initial feeding estimate, which is then refined using a supervised Machine-Learning approach to achieve improved overall accuracy.
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Nuclear Experiment (nucl-ex)
arXiv:2608.00090 [physics.data-an]
(or arXiv:2608.00090v1 [physics.data-an] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00090 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 284 words
Related coverage

How Photonic Chips Differ From Electronic Chips
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 19, 2026

IBM Built the Cold War’s Most Powerful Code Breaker for the NSA
IEEE Spectrum · Aug 25, 2026
Decoupling candidate dual AGN from chance superpositions in the GOTHIC survey via a deep-learning framework
arXiv · Aug 26, 2026
Turning spectra into images improves plant trait retrieval with 2D-CNNs
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026