aiqbench analysis
This research dissects the mechanics of short-to-long training in speech token language models, revealing that ordering gains often stem from batch composition and token weighting rather than curriculum alone. By isolating these variables under different loss functions, the study establishes a rigorous protocol for evaluating length-based strategies in variable-length architectures.
Rethinking Length-Based Training: Batch Composition and Loss Normalization in Speech Token Language Models
arXiv:2609.25890v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Short-to-long training is a simple curriculum for speech models, but its gains can be difficult to interpret. In speech token language models, length-based training can change the shuffle policy, batch composition, token retention, and token weights under batch-mean loss. We disentangle these factors through matched comparisons. In the tested settings, short-to-long ordering shows no independent benefit when batch composition and token exposure are fixed. First-epoch grouping lowers perplexity for Mimi under batch-mean loss, but this gain is not observed under token-balanced loss. The cross-tokenizer results are consistent with a link between chunk-length variation and token weighting. This work provides a systematic analysis protocol for studying length-based training in variable-length speech models.
Abstract:Short-to-long training is a simple curriculum for speech models, but its gains can be difficult to interpret. In speech token language models, length-based training can change the shuffle policy, batch composition, token retention, and token weights under batch-mean loss. We disentangle these factors through matched comparisons. In the tested settings, short-to-long ordering shows no independent benefit when batch composition and token exposure are fixed. First-epoch grouping lowers perplexity for Mimi under batch-mean loss, but this gain is not observed under token-balanced loss. The cross-tokenizer results are consistent with a link between chunk-length variation and token weighting. This work provides a systematic analysis protocol for studying length-based training in variable-length speech models.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.25890 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.25890v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25890 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 206 words
Related coverage
Debugging Logprob Mismatches in LLM Reinforcement Learning
AMD · Sep 23, 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · Oct 2, 2026
Granite 4.1 LLMs: How They’re Built
Hugging Face · Apr 29, 2026

Can we change an AI model’s architecture without retraining it from scratch?
Amazon Science · Oct 12, 2026