aiqbench analysis
This research reframes indirect prompt injection not merely as a vulnerability but as a test-time search problem within the agent's environment, emphasizing how increased attacker compute directly correlates with higher exploitation rates. The study highlights that effective security evaluations for tool-using agents must explicitly model the attacker's adaptive search procedures and computational budgets rather than assuming static defense capabilities. By introducing an agentic attacker framework, the authors provide critical insights into managing strategy redundancy and sustaining security gains as attack sophistication scales.
Rethinking Indirect Prompt Injection as a Test-Time Search Problem
arXiv:2609.04495v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We formulate indirect prompt injection as a test-time search over a task-dependent attack surface induced by the environment, user task, and injection task. To operationalize this formulation, we introduce an agentic attacker with a dedicated search harness that performs environment reconnaissance, structured reasoning over attack strategies, and adaptive evaluation using victim-agent feedback. Across heterogeneous tasks, we find that increasing attacker test-time compute improves vulnerability discovery and exploitation, while ablations show that explicit strategy management is important for avoiding redundant search and sustaining gains at larger budgets. These results suggest that agentic security evaluations should characterize both the attacker's search procedure and compute budget, rather than treating attack success as a budget-independent property of the victim. More broadly, our findings identify the attacker's adaptive search over the system attack surfaces as an important and underexplored security risk for tool-using agents.
Abstract:We formulate indirect prompt injection as a test-time search over a task-dependent attack surface induced by the environment, user task, and injection task. To operationalize this formulation, we introduce an agentic attacker with a dedicated search harness that performs environment reconnaissance, structured reasoning over attack strategies, and adaptive evaluation using victim-agent feedback. Across heterogeneous tasks, we find that increasing attacker test-time compute improves vulnerability discovery and exploitation, while ablations show that explicit strategy management is important for avoiding redundant search and sustaining gains at larger budgets. These results suggest that agentic security evaluations should characterize both the attacker's search procedure and compute budget, rather than treating attack success as a budget-independent property of the victim. More broadly, our findings identify the attacker's adaptive search over the system attack surfaces as an important and underexplored security risk for tool-using agents.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2609.04495 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.04495v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04495 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words
Related coverage

Presentation: From Copy-Paste to Composition: Building Agents Like Real Software
InfoQ · Jul 22, 2026

Presentation: Platform Teams Enabling AI - MCP/Multi-Agentic Tools across Linkedin
InfoQ · Jun 5, 2026

GEAK V3: Agent-Driven, Repository-Level GPU Kernel Optimization across HIP, Triton, and FlyDSL on AMD GPUs
AMD · Jul 20, 2026

Gemini 4 Argon: Built to solve your hardest problems
Google DeepMind · Oct 13, 2026