Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes fundamental limits on optimal symmetry testing in quantum mechanics, proving that coherence resources are generally required to achieve optimal performance for specific groups like the diagonal torus. The study quantifies the trade-offs between query numbers and resource constraints, revealing complex patterns of attainability for protocols involving qutrit Clifford groups. These findings advance our theoretical understanding of the intrinsic resource requirements for quantum hypothesis testing.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Resource Compatibility in Optimal Quantum Symmetry Testing

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.38134v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can a symmetry be tested optimally without using the quantum resource naturally associated with it? For parallel subgroup-versus-Haar testing, we derive a quantitative representation-theoretic converse for every protocol with zero type-I error: the excess type-II error is bounded below by the sum of two nonnegative penalties, one for weight on suboptimal subgroup types and one for deviations of within-type Schur profiles from their typewise extremal profiles. At optimality, both penalties vanish, yielding support and weight locking for every optimal system marginal. Disjointness of the resulting locked set and the free marginal set rules out resource-free optimality, whereas overlap alone does not establish attainability. For the diagonal torus in dimension $d\geq 2$, optimal testing without coherence is possible only with a single query. We determine both the exact optimal type-II error over all protocols with incoherent system marginals and the minimum system-marginal coherence required to attain the unrestricted optimum. For the orthogonal subgroup in dimension $d\geq 2$, a real protocol attains the optimum at every query number. For the qutrit Clifford group, Wigner-positive optimal protocols exist at three and four queries but not from five through nine; whether they exist beyond nine queries remains open. Together, these results relate the subgroup- and query-dependent resource requirements of optimal symmetry testing to structural constraints on optimal system marginals.

Abstract:Can a symmetry be tested optimally without using the quantum resource naturally associated with it? For parallel subgroup-versus-Haar testing, we derive a quantitative representation-theoretic converse for every protocol with zero type-I error: the excess type-II error is bounded below by the sum of two nonnegative penalties, one for weight on suboptimal subgroup types and one for deviations of within-type Schur profiles from their typewise extremal profiles. At optimality, both penalties vanish, yielding support and weight locking for every optimal system marginal. Disjointness of the resulting locked set and the free marginal set rules out resource-free optimality, whereas overlap alone does not establish attainability. For the diagonal torus in dimension $d\geq 2$, optimal testing without coherence is possible only with a single query. We determine both the exact optimal type-II error over all protocols with incoherent system marginals and the minimum system-marginal coherence required to attain the unrestricted optimum. For the orthogonal subgroup in dimension $d\geq 2$, a real protocol attains the optimum at every query number. For the qutrit Clifford group, Wigner-positive optimal protocols exist at three and four queries but not from five through nine; whether they exist beyond nine queries remains open. Together, these results relate the subgroup- and query-dependent resource requirements of optimal symmetry testing to structural constraints on optimal system marginals.

arXiv:2609.38134 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.38134v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38134 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words

Related coverage