aiqbench analysis
This research systematically investigates the interaction between learnable downsampling and spectral-domain filter parameterizations in convolutional networks, revealing consistent accuracy gains when utilizing learned resolution allocation. The study demonstrates that spectral kernels benefit significantly from this approach across multiple datasets and model sizes, offering a nuanced insight into optimizing spatial area retention for computer vision tasks.
Resolution Allocation with Learnable Resizing and Spectral Filter Parameterization
arXiv:2610.20274v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learnable downsampling and spectral-domain filter parameterizations have each made convolutional networks more flexible, but their interaction has not been systematically examined. We bridge this gap by examining convolutional kernels learned in the spatial and spectral domains, together with learned downsampling ratios under a cropped resizing implementation. We find that spectral and spatial kernels respond differently to learned resolution allocation, with larger gains for the spectral kernel. We observe this consistently on three datasets (EuroSAT, CIFAR-10 and STL-10) and at two model sizes (differences in accuracy gain of +0.013 to +0.028 on held-out test sets). Part of this difference reflects the greater gain of the spectral kernel from retaining more spatial area, but the difference remains positive when total retained area is matched. This pattern is observed across datasets and model sizes, although its magnitude and dependence on the complexity budget vary with model size and the resizing implementation.
Abstract:Learnable downsampling and spectral-domain filter parameterizations have each made convolutional networks more flexible, but their interaction has not been systematically examined. We bridge this gap by examining convolutional kernels learned in the spatial and spectral domains, together with learned downsampling ratios under a cropped resizing implementation. We find that spectral and spatial kernels respond differently to learned resolution allocation, with larger gains for the spectral kernel. We observe this consistently on three datasets (EuroSAT, CIFAR-10 and STL-10) and at two model sizes (differences in accuracy gain of +0.013 to +0.028 on held-out test sets). Part of this difference reflects the greater gain of the spectral kernel from retaining more spatial area, but the difference remains positive when total retained area is matched. This pattern is observed across datasets and model sizes, although its magnitude and dependence on the complexity budget vary with model size and the resizing implementation.
5 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables. Submitted to ICASSP 2027
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2610.20274 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.20274v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20274 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words
Related coverage
Learning Spectral Allocation: A Fractional Diffusion Framework for Adaptive Volumetric Segmentation
arXiv · Sep 24, 2026
Spectral filtering and crystal length as control parameters for conditional correlations in quantum imaging
arXiv · Aug 18, 2026

PRX Part 4: Our Data Strategy
Hugging Face · Jul 6, 2026
Deep Spectral Learning of Embedded Latent Transfer Operators for Stochastic Dynamical Systems
arXiv · Jun 15, 2026