Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research identifies "residual dominance" as the structural mechanism causing Transformer-based recommenders like SASRec to over-rely on the most recent user interaction during inference. By manipulating residual scaling, the authors demonstrate a direct trade-off between this localization effect and the model's ability to utilize earlier contextual information for accurate predictions. The findings offer a concrete diagnostic tool for improving sequential recommendation systems by mitigating extreme recency bias without sacrificing overall representational capacity.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Residual Dominance as a Structural Account of Last-Item Reliance in Causal Self-Attention Recommenders

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.14021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformer-based sequential recommenders with causal self-attention often rely heavily on the most recent interaction at inference time, but how this behavior is structurally expressed in the representation used for prediction remains unclear. We combine prediction-time diagnostics with norm-based analysis of the full attention block. First, we show that SASRec-style models exhibit highly localized last-item reliance. We then find that, although self-attention aggregates contextual information, residual addition sharply shifts the full-block representation toward same-position contributions, which we term residual dominance. To probe this interpretation, we use inference-time residual scaling as a controlled diagnostic intervention. Changing the residual strength induces a monotonic trade-off between structural mixing and last-item reliance, while reducing residual strength recovers a subset of final-position misses for which representations at non-final positions already rank the ground-truth item correctly. Our results provide a structural account linking extreme last-item reliance to residual dominance at inference time. The code is publicly available.

Abstract:Transformer-based sequential recommenders with causal self-attention often rely heavily on the most recent interaction at inference time, but how this behavior is structurally expressed in the representation used for prediction remains unclear. We combine prediction-time diagnostics with norm-based analysis of the full attention block. First, we show that SASRec-style models exhibit highly localized last-item reliance. We then find that, although self-attention aggregates contextual information, residual addition sharply shifts the full-block representation toward same-position contributions, which we term residual dominance. To probe this interpretation, we use inference-time residual scaling as a controlled diagnostic intervention. Changing the residual strength induces a monotonic trade-off between structural mixing and last-item reliance, while reducing residual strength recovers a subset of final-position misses for which representations at non-final positions already rank the ground-truth item correctly. Our results provide a structural account linking extreme last-item reliance to residual dominance at inference time. The code is publicly available.

11 pages, 6 figures. Accepted at the 20th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys'26)

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2608.14021 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.14021v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14021 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage