Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This theoretical study investigates residual detuning effects in the laboratory-frame anti-Jaynes-Cummings model under squeezed vacuum conditions, proposing collective Dicke coupling as a viable strategy to enhance contrast in ultrastrong circuit QED regimes. The analysis demonstrates that while single Kerr shifts fail to fully restore unit contrast at high squeezing parameters, increasing the number of coupled emitters systematically improves performance, offering critical insights for designing scalable quantum control landscapes.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Residual detuning in the laboratory-frame anti-Jaynes--Cummings model with a squeezed vacuum

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.04580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The laboratory-frame anti-Jaynes--Cummings (AJC) interaction retains a residual detuning $2f\lambda$ that is absent from the rotating-frame model. We map two proposed remedies---a Kerr shift $\chi(\hat a^\dagger\hat a)^2$ and collective Dicke coupling of $N$ two-level emitters---for a squeezed vacuum on that ladder ($r=1$, $\langle n\rangle=\sinh^2 r\simeq 1.38$). All quoted contrasts are the amplitude of the first turning point of the atomic ground-state population, which coincides with the two-level formula $\mathcal{C}=1/[1+(2f+\chi)^2]$ at $r=0$ to $10^{-9}$. Three results follow. (i)~A single Kerr strength never restores unit contrast at $r=1$; the $r=0$ $n$-dependent shift $\chi(2n+1)$ cannot cancel $2f\lambda$ on every occupied Fock component. (ii)~The exact $r=1$ contrast at $\chi=0$ is not reproduced by an incoherent sum $\sum_n P_n(r)\,\mathcal{C}_n$ built from the $r=0$ two-level formula; pointwise deviations are several tenths. (iii)~Collective coupling raises the contrast systematically. At $f=5$ one finds $\mathcal{C}=0.140$ ($N=1$) and $\mathcal{C}=0.575$ ($N=8$), above the unsqueezed value $8/[8+(2f)^2]=0.074$. The $N=16$ point at this $f$ remains truncation-limited and is not quoted to three digits. The same $N\sim(2f)^2$ estimate for $\mathcal{C}=1/2$ places trapped-ion values $f\sim 10^{2}$--$10^{3}$ outside the present construction. The relevant platform is ultrastrong circuit QED with $f\sim 1$--$10$. The calculation is a numerical control landscape, not a new solvable limit.

Abstract:The laboratory-frame anti-Jaynes--Cummings (AJC) interaction retains a residual detuning $2f\lambda$ that is absent from the rotating-frame model. We map two proposed remedies---a Kerr shift $\chi(\hat a^\dagger\hat a)^2$ and collective Dicke coupling of $N$ two-level emitters---for a squeezed vacuum on that ladder ($r=1$, $\langle n\rangle=\sinh^2 r\simeq 1.38$). All quoted contrasts are the amplitude of the first turning point of the atomic ground-state population, which coincides with the two-level formula $\mathcal{C}=1/[1+(2f+\chi)^2]$ at $r=0$ to $10^{-9}$. Three results follow. (i)~A single Kerr strength never restores unit contrast at $r=1$; the $r=0$ $n$-dependent shift $\chi(2n+1)$ cannot cancel $2f\lambda$ on every occupied Fock component. (ii)~The exact $r=1$ contrast at $\chi=0$ is not reproduced by an incoherent sum $\sum_n P_n(r)\,\mathcal{C}_n$ built from the $r=0$ two-level formula; pointwise deviations are several tenths. (iii)~Collective coupling raises the contrast systematically. At $f=5$ one finds $\mathcal{C}=0.140$ ($N=1$) and $\mathcal{C}=0.575$ ($N=8$), above the unsqueezed value $8/[8+(2f)^2]=0.074$. The $N=16$ point at this $f$ remains truncation-limited and is not quoted to three digits. The same $N\sim(2f)^2$ estimate for $\mathcal{C}=1/2$ places trapped-ion values $f\sim 10^{2}$--$10^{3}$ outside the present construction. The relevant platform is ultrastrong circuit QED with $f\sim 1$--$10$. The calculation is a numerical control landscape, not a new solvable limit.

15 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to Quantum Inf. Process

arXiv:2609.04580 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.04580v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04580 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words

Related coverage