Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

ReproAgent addresses the critical challenge of converting scientific research papers into executable code by enforcing persistent implementation contracts across long agent trajectories. This approach mitigates information loss regarding both explicit algorithmic details and implicit framework conventions, achieving state-of-the-art results on PaperBench Code-Dev. The system's architecture effectively bridges the gap between theoretical descriptions and reproducible software artifacts, advancing the reliability of scientific AI agents.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ReproAgent: Contract-Guided Paper-to-Code Reproduction

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.24291v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Paper-to-code reproduction asks scientific AI agents to turn research papers into executable repositories that preserve the paper's method, protocol and artifacts. This is difficult because the specification is split: explicit paper content such as algorithms, metrics and artifacts is often lost across long agent trajectories, while implicit details such as framework defaults and conventions inherited from related work are absent from the paper. We introduce ReproAgent, a four-stage Prepare--Plan--Generate--Repair pipeline built around a persistent implementation contract with two channels: an implementation-requirement channel that turns paper snippets into code obligations, and a reference-evidence channel that retrieves content and structure evidence from related repositories. Both are bound to work packages, projected into file-level contracts, and consumed across generation and repair. On PaperBench Code-Dev, ReproAgent reaches the highest mean score among same-backbone scaffolds under both Claude-Sonnet-4.5 and Gemini-3-Flash. End-to-end channel ablations and per-paper cases support the contribution of both channels. Code and experimental artifacts are publicly available.

Abstract:Paper-to-code reproduction asks scientific AI agents to turn research papers into executable repositories that preserve the paper's method, protocol and artifacts. This is difficult because the specification is split: explicit paper content such as algorithms, metrics and artifacts is often lost across long agent trajectories, while implicit details such as framework defaults and conventions inherited from related work are absent from the paper. We introduce ReproAgent, a four-stage Prepare--Plan--Generate--Repair pipeline built around a persistent implementation contract with two channels: an implementation-requirement channel that turns paper snippets into code obligations, and a reference-evidence channel that retrieves content and structure evidence from related repositories. Both are bound to work packages, projected into file-level contracts, and consumed across generation and repair. On PaperBench Code-Dev, ReproAgent reaches the highest mean score among same-backbone scaffolds under both Claude-Sonnet-4.5 and Gemini-3-Flash. End-to-end channel ablations and per-paper cases support the contribution of both channels. Code and experimental artifacts are publicly available.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2608.24291 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.24291v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.24291 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words

Related coverage