Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses a critical gap in embodied vision-language models (VLMs) by introducing a framework to learn recovery strategies from execution errors rather than relying on fixed inference-time policies. The authors propose AGT-GSPO, an online reinforcement learning method that significantly improves error-free completion rates and recovery capabilities within a new benchmark environment. This work advances the reliability of autonomous agents in complex manipulation tasks, which is essential for real-world deployment of AI robotics.
Source coveringarXiv

Replan for Error Recovery: Training Embodied VLMs through Verifiable Interaction with Action-Grouped Turn-GSPO

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.27003v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Embodied VLMs can execute increasingly complex manipulation tasks, yet execution errors can leave the environment in states that require replanning for recovery. Existing recovery methods either rely on inference-time mechanisms with fixed policies or learn from failure examples and reference corrections rather than verified action outcomes. To enable recovery learning through verifiable interaction, we introduce the Embodied Replanning for Recovery Environment (ERR-Env), which provides feedback on task progress and execution errors. We further construct ERR-Bench, a benchmark with held-out tasks spanning nominal, intermediate, and error states for evaluating recovery capability and execution reliability. We then propose Action-Grouped Turn-GSPO (AGT-GSPO), an online reinforcement learning method combining turn-level rewards for task progress and error states with action-grouped advantage estimation, and use it to train ERR-VLM, a compact 2B embodied VLM. Evaluation on ERR-Bench reveals a mismatch between task progress and execution reliability across diverse VLMs. AGT-GSPO improves ERR-VLM by 10.25 percentage points in Strict Success Rate for error-free completion and 22.95 percentage points in Recovery Rate, while ablations and zero-shot transfer further validate the effectiveness of our method.

Abstract:Embodied VLMs can execute increasingly complex manipulation tasks, yet execution errors can leave the environment in states that require replanning for recovery. Existing recovery methods either rely on inference-time mechanisms with fixed policies or learn from failure examples and reference corrections rather than verified action outcomes. To enable recovery learning through verifiable interaction, we introduce the Embodied Replanning for Recovery Environment (ERR-Env), which provides feedback on task progress and execution errors. We further construct ERR-Bench, a benchmark with held-out tasks spanning nominal, intermediate, and error states for evaluating recovery capability and execution reliability. We then propose Action-Grouped Turn-GSPO (AGT-GSPO), an online reinforcement learning method combining turn-level rewards for task progress and error states with action-grouped advantage estimation, and use it to train ERR-VLM, a compact 2B embodied VLM. Evaluation on ERR-Bench reveals a mismatch between task progress and execution reliability across diverse VLMs. AGT-GSPO improves ERR-VLM by 10.25 percentage points in Strict Success Rate for error-free completion and 22.95 percentage points in Recovery Rate, while ablations and zero-shot transfer further validate the effectiveness of our method.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2610.27003 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.27003v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.27003 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 269 words