aiqbench analysis
This research introduces Boundary Feature Repair (BFR), a frozen-host adaptation framework designed to correct corrupted sensor features in camera-LiDAR fusion without retraining the entire detection pipeline. By training only lightweight residual modules while keeping encoders and fusion consumers fixed, BFR significantly improves robustness across diverse corruption scenarios on KITTI-C and nuScenes datasets. The approach offers a practical retrofit for autonomous driving systems to maintain performance when sensors are present but delivering unreliable data.
Repair Before You Fuse: Frozen-Host Adaptation for Corrupted-but-Present Sensors
arXiv:2609.35264v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Camera-LiDAR detectors can continue to consume unreliable features even when both sensors remain present, synchronized, and calibrated. We introduce \emph{Boundary Feature Repair} (BFR), a frozen-host adaptation framework that learns task-supervised residual corrections at modality interfaces the detector already consumes. BFR-C repairs each camera feature level read by fusion, whereas BFR-L aligns host-conditioned LiDAR candidates to a selected boundary and routes site-wise innovations relative to the frozen anchor. Their jointly trained composition is BFR-CL. Zero-initialized per-channel scales make every variant an exact detector-level identity before optimization; only the repair modules train, while the encoders, fusion consumer, router, detection head, and host normalization statistics remain fixed. At inference, BFR requires neither clean references, corruption metadata, temporal history, nor online updates. Across the complete 20-corruption, five-severity KITTI-C grid, BFR-C reduces RCE from $14.07$ to $11.92$ on MVX-Net and from $14.29$ to $11.00$ on Focals Conv-F relative to their reproduced frozen baselines. On the latter host, BFR-L raises AP$_{\mathrm{cor}}$ from $73.65$ to $74.48$, while BFR-CL reaches $77.01$ AP$_{\mathrm{cor}}$ and $10.46$ RCE with $86.02$ clean AP. On nuScenes-R, BFR-CL raises the reproduced MoME baseline's mAP robustness ratio from $80.1$ to $81.4$. These results establish boundary repair as a targeted retrofit for corrupted-but-present sensing without retraining the deployed detector.
Abstract:Camera-LiDAR detectors can continue to consume unreliable features even when both sensors remain present, synchronized, and calibrated. We introduce \emph{Boundary Feature Repair} (BFR), a frozen-host adaptation framework that learns task-supervised residual corrections at modality interfaces the detector already consumes. BFR-C repairs each camera feature level read by fusion, whereas BFR-L aligns host-conditioned LiDAR candidates to a selected boundary and routes site-wise innovations relative to the frozen anchor. Their jointly trained composition is BFR-CL. Zero-initialized per-channel scales make every variant an exact detector-level identity before optimization; only the repair modules train, while the encoders, fusion consumer, router, detection head, and host normalization statistics remain fixed. At inference, BFR requires neither clean references, corruption metadata, temporal history, nor online updates. Across the complete 20-corruption, five-severity KITTI-C grid, BFR-C reduces RCE from $14.07$ to $11.92$ on MVX-Net and from $14.29$ to $11.00$ on Focals Conv-F relative to their reproduced frozen baselines. On the latter host, BFR-L raises AP$_{\mathrm{cor}}$ from $73.65$ to $74.48$, while BFR-CL reaches $77.01$ AP$_{\mathrm{cor}}$ and $10.46$ RCE with $86.02$ clean AP. On nuScenes-R, BFR-CL raises the reproduced MoME baseline's mAP robustness ratio from $80.1$ to $81.4$. These results establish boundary repair as a targeted retrofit for corrupted-but-present sensing without retraining the deployed detector.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.35264 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.35264v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35264 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 296 words
Related coverage
Validated Adaptation for Aerial Crowd Monitoring at Mass Gathering Scale: A Deployment Protocol, a Severity Law, and a Diagnostic for Label-Free Drone Crowd Counting, Toward the FIFA World Cup 2034 (Saudi Arabia)
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026
Optimizing ATOM and vLLM-ATOM for High-Interactivity Inference
AMD · Sep 1, 2026

OpenAI’s agents exploited a patched Linux bug in Hugging Face incident: 6 steps to take ASAP
ZDNet · Sep 1, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026