aiqbench analysis
ReliableRAG introduces a novel framework that enhances Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems by filtering deceptive misinformation through fine-grained reliability evaluation of information triples. By constructing robust reasoning chains based on verified credibility rather than just semantic relevance, this approach directly addresses critical vulnerabilities in multi-hop question answering tasks. The method demonstrates significant improvements in factual accuracy when exposed to misleading content injected into retrieval sources.
ReliableRAG: Combating Misinformation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Reliability-Guided Reasoning Chains
arXiv:2608.25487v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful architecture for Question Answering (QA) by integrating external information into Large Language Models (LLMs). However, false, inaccurate, and misleading information in news and social media poses a serious challenge to real-world RAG systems, especially in multi-hop QA, where complex multi-step reasoning can be misled by even a single deceptive misinformation segment in the retrieved documents. Existing approaches mainly rely on implicit alignment or explicit regulation, but their limited ability to assess fine-grained information reliability makes them vulnerable to deceptive misinformation that is semantically relevant to the question yet factually incorrect, leading to erroneous answers. To address this limitation, we propose ReliableRAG, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first reliability-driven framework that mitigates deceptive misinformation in multi-hop QA through fine-grained evaluation of individual triples. ReliableRAG first extracts information segments from source documents and represents them as structured triples. It then quantifies triple reliability by combining query-triple semantic relevance with triple credibility, retaining only the top-$K$ reliable and non-redundant triples. Based on these refined triples, ReliableRAG autoregressively constructs robust reasoning chains to consolidate trustworthy evidence and filter deceptive misinformation, producing accurate answers faithful to reliable information. Experiments on three multi-hop QA datasets show that ReliableRAG outperforms existing methods, substantially improving the factual reliability and robustness of RAG systems under deceptive misinformation injection.
Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful architecture for Question Answering (QA) by integrating external information into Large Language Models (LLMs). However, false, inaccurate, and misleading information in news and social media poses a serious challenge to real-world RAG systems, especially in multi-hop QA, where complex multi-step reasoning can be misled by even a single deceptive misinformation segment in the retrieved documents. Existing approaches mainly rely on implicit alignment or explicit regulation, but their limited ability to assess fine-grained information reliability makes them vulnerable to deceptive misinformation that is semantically relevant to the question yet factually incorrect, leading to erroneous answers. To address this limitation, we propose ReliableRAG, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first reliability-driven framework that mitigates deceptive misinformation in multi-hop QA through fine-grained evaluation of individual triples. ReliableRAG first extracts information segments from source documents and represents them as structured triples. It then quantifies triple reliability by combining query-triple semantic relevance with triple credibility, retaining only the top-$K$ reliable and non-redundant triples. Based on these refined triples, ReliableRAG autoregressively constructs robust reasoning chains to consolidate trustworthy evidence and filter deceptive misinformation, producing accurate answers faithful to reliable information. Experiments on three multi-hop QA datasets show that ReliableRAG outperforms existing methods, substantially improving the factual reliability and robustness of RAG systems under deceptive misinformation injection.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
arXiv:2608.25487 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.25487v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25487 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 319 words
Related coverage
RADAR: Retrieval-Augmented Detector with Adversarial Refinement for Adaptive LLM-Generated Fake News Detection
arXiv · Sep 22, 2026
VisRAG2.0: Mitigating Visual Hallucinations via Evidence-Guided Multi-Image Reasoning in Visual Retrieval-Augmented Generation
arXiv · Jul 29, 2026

Presentation: Engineering AI for Creativity and Curiosity on Mobile
InfoQ · Jul 21, 2026
Trustworthy RAG: An Evaluation Agent for Detecting Misinformation and Knowledge Poisoning in Generative AI Systems
arXiv · Aug 24, 2026