aiqbench analysis
The paper targets a real weakness in LLM agents that reuse memory in context: a notable share of stored claims (12–33% in the authors' tests) hurt performance when reused. RIKA proposes admitting claims based on source evidence and later experience, without extra validation tasks, and reports gains across six task streams and four model backbones. For readers, the key questions are whether the gains hold on benchmarks beyond Continual Learning Bench and what the cost of the admission step is in practice.
Reliable Knowledge Acquisition for Continual Learning Agents
arXiv:2610.21739v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As agents powered by foundation models move into open-ended environments, continual learning from experience becomes essential. For agents built on models with fixed parameters, this learning requires reusing prior task experience in context to improve performance and efficiency on future tasks. Existing memory and experience-learning systems typically focus on either retained facts or procedures, and lack a mechanism for establishing the reliability of claims extracted from the ongoing task stream. Indeed, we find that approximately 12--33\% of entries produced by representative systems harm future task performance when reused. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{RIKA} (Reliable Knowledge Acquisition), which combines hierarchical extraction of factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge with Evidence-based Knowledge Admission, which uses source evidence and subsequent experience to govern which claims enter the task agent's context, without additional validation tasks. Across six task streams from Continual Learning Bench and four model backbones, RIKA achieves the highest aggregate score on every backbone.
Abstract:As agents powered by foundation models move into open-ended environments, continual learning from experience becomes essential. For agents built on models with fixed parameters, this learning requires reusing prior task experience in context to improve performance and efficiency on future tasks. Existing memory and experience-learning systems typically focus on either retained facts or procedures, and lack a mechanism for establishing the reliability of claims extracted from the ongoing task stream. Indeed, we find that approximately 12--33\% of entries produced by representative systems harm future task performance when reused. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{RIKA} (Reliable Knowledge Acquisition), which combines hierarchical extraction of factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge with Evidence-based Knowledge Admission, which uses source evidence and subsequent experience to govern which claims enter the task agent's context, without additional validation tasks. Across six task streams from Continual Learning Bench and four model backbones, RIKA achieves the highest aggregate score on every backbone.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.21739 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.21739v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21739 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 255 words
