Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.

Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Reliable data clustering with Bayesian community detection

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2510.15013v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: From neuroscience and genomics to systems biology and ecology, researchers rely on clustering similarity data to uncover modular structure. Most methods work in two steps: first reduce noise, then cluster. The first step runs without regard to the second: it forces arbitrary choices, discards useful information, and can impose structure where none exists. Here we bring the two steps together. Using established Bayesian community detection methods, we let one minimum description length criterion choose both how much to sparsify the data and how to cluster it. This one-step approach keeps all the samples for inference, removes the arbitrary threshold choice, and returns a single cluster when there is no real structure. On synthetic data, our approach recovers clusters under more noise and with fewer samples than standard methods. On gene co-expression data from the human brain, it finds more coherent and more stable clusters than WGCNA, the standard tool in the field. Uniting sparsification and clustering in a single model-selection step provides a principled, noise-resistant way to uncover modular structure in similarity data across fields.

Abstract:From neuroscience and genomics to systems biology and ecology, researchers rely on clustering similarity data to uncover modular structure. Most methods work in two steps: first reduce noise, then cluster. The first step runs without regard to the second: it forces arbitrary choices, discards useful information, and can impose structure where none exists. Here we bring the two steps together. Using established Bayesian community detection methods, we let one minimum description length criterion choose both how much to sparsify the data and how to cluster it. This one-step approach keeps all the samples for inference, removes the arbitrary threshold choice, and returns a single cluster when there is no real structure. On synthetic data, our approach recovers clusters under more noise and with fewer samples than standard methods. On gene co-expression data from the human brain, it finds more coherent and more stable clusters than WGCNA, the standard tool in the field. Uniting sparsification and clustering in a single model-selection step provides a principled, noise-resistant way to uncover modular structure in similarity data across fields.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Methodology (stat.ME)

arXiv:2510.15013 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2510.15013v2 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.15013 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words

Related coverage