aiqbench analysis
This theoretical study establishes that while universal quantum work extraction does not require knowledge of the input state for asymptotic rates, achieving optimal exponential reliability fundamentally depends on it. The authors prove via a trigonometric Remez inequality that phase-independent protocols are inherently limited in their worst-case failure decay compared to those utilizing full state information. This result clarifies the precise thermodynamic cost of robustness against unknown quantum phases in coherent qubit systems.
Reliability Is Not Free in Universal Quantum Work Extraction
arXiv:2607.16702v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Universal work extraction shows that input-state knowledge is unnecessary to attain the asymptotic free-energy rate. We ask whether this first-order universality extends to reliability, the exponential decay rate of extraction failure. In the work-battery fidelity formulation, we prove that no phase-independent Gibbs-preserving protocol can retain the state-aware Gibbs-preserving exponent throughout a coherent qubit time-translation orbit: at every positive target rate, its worst pointwise exponent is bounded by the corresponding state-aware thermal-operation value. The proof first establishes an exact finite-blocklength identity between phase-robust Gibbs-preserving extraction and state-aware thermal extraction. A trigonometric Remez inequality then upgrades this minimax identity to a pointwise theorem by ruling out exponential localization of the worst phase. For an explicit coherent-qubit family, known-phase Gibbs-preserving extraction is error free, whereas every phase-independent protocol has a finite worst-pointwise exponent. Thus input-state knowledge can be irrelevant to the first-order work rate yet indispensable for optimal exponential reliability.
Abstract:Universal work extraction shows that input-state knowledge is unnecessary to attain the asymptotic free-energy rate. We ask whether this first-order universality extends to reliability, the exponential decay rate of extraction failure. In the work-battery fidelity formulation, we prove that no phase-independent Gibbs-preserving protocol can retain the state-aware Gibbs-preserving exponent throughout a coherent qubit time-translation orbit: at every positive target rate, its worst pointwise exponent is bounded by the corresponding state-aware thermal-operation value. The proof first establishes an exact finite-blocklength identity between phase-robust Gibbs-preserving extraction and state-aware thermal extraction. A trigonometric Remez inequality then upgrades this minimax identity to a pointwise theorem by ruling out exponential localization of the worst phase. For an explicit coherent-qubit family, known-phase Gibbs-preserving extraction is error free, whereas every phase-independent protocol has a finite worst-pointwise exponent. Thus input-state knowledge can be irrelevant to the first-order work rate yet indispensable for optimal exponential reliability.
arXiv:2607.16702 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2607.16702v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16702 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 238 words
Related coverage

Quantum Work Extraction Methods Yield Differing Long-Term Performance
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 9, 2026

Quantum Engines Face Higher Costs for Greater Measurement Precision
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 14, 2026

Qoreo Language Guarantees Deadlock-Free Quantum Network Programs
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 23, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026