Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces ReLay, a dataset evaluating how Large Language Models can personalize Plain Language Summaries to improve comprehension while managing risks like hallucinations and bias reinforcement. The study highlights a critical trade-off between tailoring content to individual user needs and maintaining the safety and accuracy required for high-stakes domains like healthcare. For AI practitioners, this underscores the necessity of developing robust personalization strategies that do not compromise on trustworthiness or introduce new vulnerabilities.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ReLay: Personalized LLM-Generated Plain-Language Summaries for Better Understanding, but at What Cost?

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.00468v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Plain Language Summaries (PLS) aim to make research accessible to lay readers, but they are typically written in a one-size-fits-all style that ignores differences in readers' information needs and comprehension. In health contexts, this limitation is particularly important because misunderstanding scientific information can affect real-world decisions. Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for personalizing PLS, but it remains unclear whether personalization helps, which strategies are most effective, and how to balance personalization with safety. We introduce ReLay, a dataset of 300 participant--PLS pairs from 50 lay participants in both static (expert-written) and interactive (LLM-personalized) settings. ReLay includes user characteristics, health information needs, information-seeking behavior, comprehension outcomes, interaction logs, and quality ratings. We use ReLay to evaluate five LLMs across two personalization methods. Personalization improves comprehension and perceived quality, but it also raises the risk of reinforcing user biases and introducing hallucinations, revealing a trade-off between personalization and safety. These findings highlight the need for personalization methods that are both effective and trustworthy for diverse lay audiences.

Authors:Joey Chan, Yikun Han, Jingyuan Chen, Samuel Fang, Lauren D. Gryboski, Alexandra Lee, Sheel Tanna, Qingqing Zhu, Zhiyong Lu, Lucy Lu Wang, Yue Guo

Abstract:Plain Language Summaries (PLS) aim to make research accessible to lay readers, but they are typically written in a one-size-fits-all style that ignores differences in readers' information needs and comprehension. In health contexts, this limitation is particularly important because misunderstanding scientific information can affect real-world decisions. Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for personalizing PLS, but it remains unclear whether personalization helps, which strategies are most effective, and how to balance personalization with safety. We introduce ReLay, a dataset of 300 participant--PLS pairs from 50 lay participants in both static (expert-written) and interactive (LLM-personalized) settings. ReLay includes user characteristics, health information needs, information-seeking behavior, comprehension outcomes, interaction logs, and quality ratings. We use ReLay to evaluate five LLMs across two personalization methods. Personalization improves comprehension and perceived quality, but it also raises the risk of reinforcing user biases and introducing hallucinations, revealing a trade-off between personalization and safety. These findings highlight the need for personalization methods that are both effective and trustworthy for diverse lay audiences.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2605.00468 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.00468v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 203 words

Related coverage