aiqbench analysis
This research explores enhancing robot interaction by integrating explicit spatial relations into 3D scene graphs to improve how large language models ground natural language commands in physical environments. The study finds that while adding these relational edges significantly boosts object grounding accuracy, the choice between open- and closed-vocabulary relation generation offers no clear performance advantage when using vision-language models for mapping.
Relational Scene Graphs for Object Grounding of Natural Language Commands
arXiv:2602.04635v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Robots are finding wider adoption in human environments, increasing the need for natural human-robot interaction. However, understanding a natural language command requires the robot to infer the intended task and how to decompose it into executable actions, and to ground those actions in the robot's knowledge of the environment, including relevant objects, agents, and locations. This challenge can be addressed by combining the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to understand natural language with 3D scene graphs (3DSGs) for grounding inferred actions in a semantic representation of the environment. However, many 3DSGs lack explicit spatial relations between objects, even though humans often rely on these relations to describe an environment. This paper investigates whether incorporating open- or closed-vocabulary spatial relations into 3DSGs can improve the ability of LLMs to interpret natural language commands. To address this, we implement two pipelines using off-the-shelf models: an LLM-based pipeline for target object grounding from open-vocabulary language commands and a vision language model-based pipeline to add open-vocabulary spatial edges to 3DSGs from images captured while mapping. Finally, we evaluate two LLMs across 14 scenes using 905 natural language statements (786 procedurally-generated, 119 human-authored) to assess performance on the downstream task of target object grounding. Our study demonstrates that explicit spatial relations improve the ability of LLMs to ground objects, and while open-vocabulary relation generation with vision language models proves feasible from robot-captured images, our analysis did not yield evidence favoring either open- or closed-vocabulary relations.
Abstract:Robots are finding wider adoption in human environments, increasing the need for natural human-robot interaction. However, understanding a natural language command requires the robot to infer the intended task and how to decompose it into executable actions, and to ground those actions in the robot's knowledge of the environment, including relevant objects, agents, and locations. This challenge can be addressed by combining the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to understand natural language with 3D scene graphs (3DSGs) for grounding inferred actions in a semantic representation of the environment. However, many 3DSGs lack explicit spatial relations between objects, even though humans often rely on these relations to describe an environment. This paper investigates whether incorporating open- or closed-vocabulary spatial relations into 3DSGs can improve the ability of LLMs to interpret natural language commands. To address this, we implement two pipelines using off-the-shelf models: an LLM-based pipeline for target object grounding from open-vocabulary language commands and a vision language model-based pipeline to add open-vocabulary spatial edges to 3DSGs from images captured while mapping. Finally, we evaluate two LLMs across 14 scenes using 905 natural language statements (786 procedurally-generated, 119 human-authored) to assess performance on the downstream task of target object grounding. Our study demonstrates that explicit spatial relations improve the ability of LLMs to ground objects, and while open-vocabulary relation generation with vision language models proves feasible from robot-captured images, our analysis did not yield evidence favoring either open- or closed-vocabulary relations.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2602.04635 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2602.04635v2 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.04635 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 332 words
Related coverage

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026
Embodied Zero-Shot Task Planning via Hardware-Aware LLM-VLM Integration for Grounded Robotic Manipulation
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
EndoNav: Semantic-to-Geometric Grounding for Language-Guided Robotic Endoscopic Examination
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026
VIGOR: Verifiable Industrial Geometry Optimization and Repair in Scene Programs
arXiv · Oct 12, 2026