aiqbench analysis
This research tackles the stability of multi-agent reinforcement learning by quantifying how peer policy updates erode reusable structural patterns in an agent's environment. By establishing worst-case-tight bounds on this "core erosion," the authors provide theoretical guarantees for survival horizons and transfer regret, effectively certifying when an agent's learned strategies will fail under dynamic social conditions. The findings offer a rigorous framework for designing robust continual learning systems that can adapt to shifting peer behaviors without catastrophic performance degradation.
Reinforcing the World's Edge: A Continual Learning Problem in the Multi-Agent-World Boundary
arXiv:2603.06813v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In a stationary decentralized Markov game, learning peers generate an episode-indexed sequence of induced MDPs for any focal agent. The joint game remains stationary while the focal agent's rewards and dynamics drift, forming an agent-centric continual reinforcement-learning problem. Marginalizing peers whose policies are fixed within an episode preserves every focal trajectory law and expected return. Success-conditioned reusable structure may therefore degrade under peer updates. An \emph{invariant core} represents such structure through maximal abstract patterns appearing in a high fraction of successful focal trajectories. The main result is a worst-case-tight conditioning theorem: trajectory-law drift $\varepsilon$ can reduce a candidate's success-conditioned coverage by at most $\frac{\varepsilon}{p_0}$, where $p_0$ is its reference success mass, and the coefficient is sharp. Peer-policy movement supplies $\varepsilon$; positive coverage margin then yields a certified $\Omega(\frac{1}{\eta})$ survival horizon and, under an explicit effective-conflict condition realized by exact policy gradient in an analytic class, a matching $\Theta(\frac{1}{\eta})$ first-exit law. With calibrated success mass and executability, the same certificate yields policy-value, library-selection, and transfer-regret guarantees. An exactly solvable corridor confirms the structural predictions, including the inverse-rate lifetime ($R^2>0.9999$). Two registered 64-stream studies in continual control and cue-MNIST show that core erosion predicts impending failure and enables near-oracle intervention; an exploratory reanalysis of eight learned-partner Level-Based Foraging development pairings suggests the same erosion--failure link under peer learning.
Abstract:In a stationary decentralized Markov game, learning peers generate an episode-indexed sequence of induced MDPs for any focal agent. The joint game remains stationary while the focal agent's rewards and dynamics drift, forming an agent-centric continual reinforcement-learning problem. Marginalizing peers whose policies are fixed within an episode preserves every focal trajectory law and expected return. Success-conditioned reusable structure may therefore degrade under peer updates. An \emph{invariant core} represents such structure through maximal abstract patterns appearing in a high fraction of successful focal trajectories. The main result is a worst-case-tight conditioning theorem: trajectory-law drift $\varepsilon$ can reduce a candidate's success-conditioned coverage by at most $\frac{\varepsilon}{p_0}$, where $p_0$ is its reference success mass, and the coefficient is sharp. Peer-policy movement supplies $\varepsilon$; positive coverage margin then yields a certified $\Omega(\frac{1}{\eta})$ survival horizon and, under an explicit effective-conflict condition realized by exact policy gradient in an analytic class, a matching $\Theta(\frac{1}{\eta})$ first-exit law. With calibrated success mass and executability, the same certificate yields policy-value, library-selection, and transfer-regret guarantees. An exactly solvable corridor confirms the structural predictions, including the inverse-rate lifetime ($R^2>0.9999$). Two registered 64-stream studies in continual control and cue-MNIST show that core erosion predicts impending failure and enables near-oracle intervention; an exploratory reanalysis of eight learned-partner Level-Based Foraging development pairings suggests the same erosion--failure link under peer learning.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2603.06813 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2603.06813v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.06813 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 308 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

The Machines that Make the Machines
NVIDIA · Oct 7, 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · May 27, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026