Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This arXiv paper proposes Advantage Guidance, a way to get reinforcement-learning-like performance from a supervised learning objective that conditions on future rewards or advantages, combined with contrastive diffusion guidance at sampling time. The authors report gains over prior RL methods on 26 long-horizon, sparse-reward tasks, but these are preprint results on benchmark tasks and have not been independently validated. For practitioners, the appeal is the stability of supervised training as an alternative to RL's hyperparameter sensitivity.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist, LessWrong, itbusinessnet.com
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Reinforcement Learning via Advantage Guidance

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.19783v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) holds the promise of learning a policy that can outperform what is shown in the data. However, in practice, such systems suffer from instability and hyperparameter sensitivity. In contrast, supervised learning provides a stable and scalable training objective, but is fundamentally limited by the quality of the demonstrated behavior. In this paper, we ask whether we can perform policy optimization with something as simple and stable as supervised learning but as performant as RL. Unfortunately, naively training the policy with supervised learning and conditioning on future rewards or advantages typically underperform dedicated RL methods. We introduce a new policy extraction method, Advantage Guidance, that retains the simple supervised learning structure with advantage conditioning while outperforming prior RL methods through effective conditional training and contrastive diffusion guidance during sampling. We show that Advantage Guidance can significantly improve a model's ability to respond to conditional advantage signals, and the contrastive guidance during sampling can use the learned advantage-conditioned policy to target the KL-regularized optimal policy. Empirically, we find that Advantage Guidance significantly outperforms prior state-of-the-art RL methods on 26 long-horizon, sparse reward tasks across datasets with varying degrees of optimality.

Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) holds the promise of learning a policy that can outperform what is shown in the data. However, in practice, such systems suffer from instability and hyperparameter sensitivity. In contrast, supervised learning provides a stable and scalable training objective, but is fundamentally limited by the quality of the demonstrated behavior. In this paper, we ask whether we can perform policy optimization with something as simple and stable as supervised learning but as performant as RL. Unfortunately, naively training the policy with supervised learning and conditioning on future rewards or advantages typically underperform dedicated RL methods. We introduce a new policy extraction method, Advantage Guidance, that retains the simple supervised learning structure with advantage conditioning while outperforming prior RL methods through effective conditional training and contrastive diffusion guidance during sampling. We show that Advantage Guidance can significantly improve a model's ability to respond to conditional advantage signals, and the contrastive guidance during sampling can use the learned advantage-conditioned policy to target the KL-regularized optimal policy. Empirically, we find that Advantage Guidance significantly outperforms prior state-of-the-art RL methods on 26 long-horizon, sparse reward tasks across datasets with varying degrees of optimality.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.19783 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.19783v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19783 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words

Related coverage