Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research applies Proximal Policy Optimization to optimize sensor selection in maritime networks, achieving tracking performance comparable to always-on systems while significantly reducing computational costs and energy consumption. By leveraging belief-state representations from a Bayesian tracker, the learned policy efficiently manages heterogeneous sensors without relying on expensive online entropy calculations. The work demonstrates practical efficiency gains for resource-constrained edge deployments in complex sensing environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Reinforcement Learning for Heterogeneous Sensor Selection in Maritime Surveillance

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.22667v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents an information-gain-guided reinforcement-learning sensor-selection framework for single-vessel tracking in heterogeneous maritime sensor networks. The proposed approach is motivated by information-theoretic sensor management: instead of activating all sensors or repeatedly performing computationally expensive online expected-information-gain evaluation, a learned policy selects one tracking-relevant sensor at each decision epoch. A Bayesian sequential Monte Carlo tracker estimates the vessel state from noisy measurements and provides a belief representation for scheduling under nonlinear and non-Gaussian conditions. A Proximal Policy Optimization agent selects one of five sensors deployed in a georeferenced simulation of the CMMI Smart Marina testbed at Ayia Napa Marina, Cyprus. The agent observes belief-state, detection-history, coverage, sensor-geometry, and realized-information-gain features. The reward is defined as a realized-information-gain term gated by an observability mask. Final-test simulations compare the proposed framework with random single-sensor selection, always-on sensing using all sensors simultaneously, and the expected-information-gain sensor-selection baseline proposed in our previous work. Results show that the learned policy achieves tracking performance close to always-on sensing while activating only one sensor per decision time step and avoiding the computationally expensive online entropy search required by expected-information-gain selection.

Abstract:This paper presents an information-gain-guided reinforcement-learning sensor-selection framework for single-vessel tracking in heterogeneous maritime sensor networks. The proposed approach is motivated by information-theoretic sensor management: instead of activating all sensors or repeatedly performing computationally expensive online expected-information-gain evaluation, a learned policy selects one tracking-relevant sensor at each decision epoch. A Bayesian sequential Monte Carlo tracker estimates the vessel state from noisy measurements and provides a belief representation for scheduling under nonlinear and non-Gaussian conditions. A Proximal Policy Optimization agent selects one of five sensors deployed in a georeferenced simulation of the CMMI Smart Marina testbed at Ayia Napa Marina, Cyprus. The agent observes belief-state, detection-history, coverage, sensor-geometry, and realized-information-gain features. The reward is defined as a realized-information-gain term gated by an observability mask. Final-test simulations compare the proposed framework with random single-sensor selection, always-on sensing using all sensors simultaneously, and the expected-information-gain sensor-selection baseline proposed in our previous work. Results show that the learned policy achieves tracking performance close to always-on sensing while activating only one sensor per decision time step and avoiding the computationally expensive online entropy search required by expected-information-gain selection.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Theory (cs.IT); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Robotics (cs.RO); Signal Processing (eess.SP); Systems and Control (eess.SY)

I.2.6; I.2.8; I.4.8; G.3

arXiv:2607.22667 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.22667v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22667 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 220 words

Related coverage