Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical challenge in causal inference by introducing a two-step regression estimator that effectively corrects for both selection bias and confounding using proxy variables. The proposed method demonstrates lower variance compared to existing estimators while maintaining consistency in unbiased scenarios, offering a more robust approach for deriving reliable causal effects from distorted observational data.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Regression-Based Estimation of Causal Effects in the Presence of Selection Bias and Confounding

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2503.20546v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider the problem of estimating the expected causal effect $E[Y|do(X)]$ for a target variable $Y$ when treatment $X$ is set by intervention, focusing on continuous random variables. In settings without selection bias or confounding, $E[Y|do(X)] = E[Y|X]$, which can be estimated using standard regression methods. However, regression fails when systematic missingness induced by selection bias, or confounding distorts the data. Proxy variables unaffected by the selection process can, under certain constraints, be used to correct for selection bias to recover $E[Y|X]$, and hence $E[Y|do(X)]$, reliably. When data is additionally affected by confounding, recovering the causal effect from selection-biased data is more challenging and requires access to proxies to both correct for confounding and for the selection mechanism. Assuming access to such proxies from external unbiased observational data, we derive theoretical conditions ensuring identifiability and recoverability of causal effects. We further introduce a linear two-step regression estimator (TSR), which can be extended through adding non-linear basis functions, capable of exploiting proxy variables to adjust for selection bias while accounting for confounding. We show that TSR is consistent with previous estimators when confounding is absent, but achieves a lower variance. Extensive simulation studies validate TSR's correctness for scenarios that include both selection bias and confounding with proxy variables.

Abstract:We consider the problem of estimating the expected causal effect $E[Y|do(X)]$ for a target variable $Y$ when treatment $X$ is set by intervention, focusing on continuous random variables. In settings without selection bias or confounding, $E[Y|do(X)] = E[Y|X]$, which can be estimated using standard regression methods. However, regression fails when systematic missingness induced by selection bias, or confounding distorts the data. Proxy variables unaffected by the selection process can, under certain constraints, be used to correct for selection bias to recover $E[Y|X]$, and hence $E[Y|do(X)]$, reliably. When data is additionally affected by confounding, recovering the causal effect from selection-biased data is more challenging and requires access to proxies to both correct for confounding and for the selection mechanism. Assuming access to such proxies from external unbiased observational data, we derive theoretical conditions ensuring identifiability and recoverability of causal effects. We further introduce a linear two-step regression estimator (TSR), which can be extended through adding non-linear basis functions, capable of exploiting proxy variables to adjust for selection bias while accounting for confounding. We show that TSR is consistent with previous estimators when confounding is absent, but achieves a lower variance. Extensive simulation studies validate TSR's correctness for scenarios that include both selection bias and confounding with proxy variables.

The underlying manuscript was accepted for publication after peer review. This author-updated version contains an additional post-acceptance paragraph in Appendix A.2. The Version of Record is available online at: this https URL

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Methodology (stat.ME)

arXiv:2503.20546 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2503.20546v2 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-026-07054-6 DOI(s) linking to related resources

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage