Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces a benchmark of 488 human-annotated fields from 20 US state PFAS documents and 46 regulations, with provenance-aware metrics for judging whether extracted facts trace back to their source. The experiments with open and closed LLMs find that document identification fields remain hard and that field-specific few-shot examples help. For AI readers, the practical takeaway is that regulatory extraction still exposes weaknesses in LLM grounding, so benchmark results should be read with attention to provenance, not just value accuracy.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

RegExtract: A Benchmark for PFAS Regulatory Information Extraction with LLMs

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.15103v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Extracting structured information from regulatory documents is a critical but challenging task. Relevant facts are scattered across long, legally dense texts, and traceability of extracted facts to their source is essential for verification. With increasing awareness of the environmental and health impacts of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), regulatory documents have expanded significantly, varying in scope and product relevance, making interpretation challenging for manufacturers and policymakers. We introduce RegExtract, a benchmark for structured information extraction from PFAS regulatory documents, comprising 488 human-annotated field instances across 20 US state documents and 46 regulations. Each field instance includes a value and a provenance entry, yielding 976 entries in total. We define a typed, multi-field schema targeting key elements such as material definitions, permitted uses, and product exemptions, and propose provenance-aware evaluation metrics tailored to regulatory text. Through experiments with open- and closed-source LLMs across prompting strategies, document condensing methods, and schema partitioning approaches, we find that document identification fields remain challenging, and that field-specific few-shot examples improve extraction. This work lays the groundwork for AI tools for hazardous substance identification, question answering, and compliance monitoring. The code and data are available at https://github.com/IBM/PFAS-regulations.

Authors:Defne Circi, Krystelle Lionti, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, Daniel P. Sanders, L. Catherine Brinson, Bhuwan Dhingra, Basel Shbita, Mohab Elkaref, Sara Capponi, Tim Erdmann, Brandi Ransom

Abstract:Extracting structured information from regulatory documents is a critical but challenging task. Relevant facts are scattered across long, legally dense texts, and traceability of extracted facts to their source is essential for verification. With increasing awareness of the environmental and health impacts of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), regulatory documents have expanded significantly, varying in scope and product relevance, making interpretation challenging for manufacturers and policymakers. We introduce RegExtract, a benchmark for structured information extraction from PFAS regulatory documents, comprising 488 human-annotated field instances across 20 US state documents and 46 regulations. Each field instance includes a value and a provenance entry, yielding 976 entries in total. We define a typed, multi-field schema targeting key elements such as material definitions, permitted uses, and product exemptions, and propose provenance-aware evaluation metrics tailored to regulatory text. Through experiments with open- and closed-source LLMs across prompting strategies, document condensing methods, and schema partitioning approaches, we find that document identification fields remain challenging, and that field-specific few-shot examples improve extraction. This work lays the groundwork for AI tools for hazardous substance identification, question answering, and compliance monitoring. The code and data are available at this https URL.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.15103 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.15103v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15103 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 236 words

Related coverage