aiqbench analysis
REFLEX introduces a hybrid agent architecture that offloads bounded decisions to a fast, typed decision layer (Jev), reserving strong LLM calls only for low-confidence scenarios or text generation. This approach reduces computational costs by 72.7% on a benchmark while maintaining high success rates, though its marginal gains diminish when standard routing is already highly accurate. The study clarifies the specific conditions under which selective control mechanisms effectively optimize inference efficiency without compromising reliability.
REFLEX with Jev for Efficient Selective Control in LLM Agents
arXiv:2609.26532v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents often use generative models for bounded decisions, raising the question of when these decisions can be handled more efficiently without reducing task success. We study REFLEX, an agent architecture that uses Jev as a fast, typed decision layer and calls a strong LLM when confidence is low, or generation is required. On a frozen 100-task benchmark, REFLEX achieves 95% success with 72.7% fewer strong-model calls than a strong-only agent, with reductions persisting across three fallback families. Controlled interventions show that reliability depends on action-set size and near-valid alternatives near authorization boundaries. External BFCL and $\tau$-style evaluations reveal limited advantages over a cheap generative cascade when ordinary routing is already highly accurate. These findings identify when selective control with Jev can reduce computation and where its benefits are limited.
Abstract:LLM agents often use generative models for bounded decisions, raising the question of when these decisions can be handled more efficiently without reducing task success. We study REFLEX, an agent architecture that uses Jev as a fast, typed decision layer and calls a strong LLM when confidence is low, or generation is required. On a frozen 100-task benchmark, REFLEX achieves 95% success with 72.7% fewer strong-model calls than a strong-only agent, with reductions persisting across three fallback families. Controlled interventions show that reliability depends on action-set size and near-valid alternatives near authorization boundaries. External BFCL and $\tau$-style evaluations reveal limited advantages over a cheap generative cascade when ordinary routing is already highly accurate. These findings identify when selective control with Jev can reduce computation and where its benefits are limited.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.26532 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.26532v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26532 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 224 words
Related coverage

Skydio CEO Adam Bry on why Silicon Valley shouldn’t draw red lines for drone use
The Verge · Jun 15, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

All Systems Go: Global PC App Ecosystem Ready for NVIDIA RTX Spark
NVIDIA · Oct 13, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026