Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This study examines the human-AI dynamic in creative workflows, specifically analyzing how users negotiate control and boundaries when collaborating with a generative drawing system called Froggi-Draw. The research highlights that perceived encroachment by the AI can disrupt the creative process, suggesting that future co-creative tools must prioritize flexible power dynamics to support user reflection.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Reflecting on Creative-Boundaries with an AI Co-Doodler

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.05482v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this pictorial, we consider how the negotiation of creative boundaries with a co-creative AI system can create moments for personal creative reflection. We ground this in our experiences with Froggi-Draw, a single-initiative co-doodling system that gives users power to decide when and how much an AI "collaborator" (Froggi) contributes to their drawing. From a 1-week pilot study where (n=8) novice and experienced artists doodled daily with the system, we report on ways participants navigated creative risk and uncertainty, and how their usage and perceptions of Froggi shifted over time. In moments of disruption, participants described the system as encroaching on their creative territory. We consider how the design of a supportive, co-creative AI "collaborator" might look like the design of a supportive power dynamic---and finding ways to offer users control to find, reflect upon, and flexibly negotiate the boundaries of that dynamic.

Abstract:In this pictorial, we consider how the negotiation of creative boundaries with a co-creative AI system can create moments for personal creative reflection. We ground this in our experiences with Froggi-Draw, a single-initiative co-doodling system that gives users power to decide when and how much an AI "collaborator" (Froggi) contributes to their drawing. From a 1-week pilot study where (n=8) novice and experienced artists doodled daily with the system, we report on ways participants navigated creative risk and uncertainty, and how their usage and perceptions of Froggi shifted over time. In moments of disruption, participants described the system as encroaching on their creative territory. We consider how the design of a supportive, co-creative AI "collaborator" might look like the design of a supportive power dynamic---and finding ways to offer users control to find, reflect upon, and flexibly negotiate the boundaries of that dynamic.

In Proceedings of The First Reflection in Creative Experience (RiCE) Workshop (RiCE W1) arXiv:2607.24558

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Graphics (cs.GR)

arXiv:2610.05482 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2610.05482v1 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05482 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 256 words

Related coverage