Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper targets a concrete cost in training implicit neural representations: evaluating dense coordinate grids. Its reported gains are measured against a fixed wall-clock budget and a set of evaluated baselines on Navier-Stokes fields, so the 6x speedup is a benchmark-specific result rather than a general claim. Readers working on scientific ML or neural field compression should check whether the stratified sampling and dynamic resolution scheme holds up on other physical systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Refined Grid Sampling for Efficient Implicit Neural Representations of Large-Scale Scientific Data

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.14205v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Implicit neural representations (INRs) offer a powerful framework for modeling high-dimensional physical fields, but their training remains inefficient because evaluating dense coordinate grids is computationally expensive. Existing coordinate-pruning strategies rely on local error functions that can oversample correlated points and incur substantial overhead from full-grid error evaluation. We introduce Refined Grid Sampling (RGS), which combines stratified grid sampling, error-based refinement, and dynamic grid-resolution adjustment. This design reduces spatial redundancy without evaluating errors over the full grid. On high-resolution Navier--Stokes fields, RGS achieves higher reconstruction accuracy within a fixed wall-clock budget and reaches the accuracy of full-grid training up to $6\times$ faster than the evaluated baselines.

Abstract:Implicit neural representations (INRs) offer a powerful framework for modeling high-dimensional physical fields, but their training remains inefficient because evaluating dense coordinate grids is computationally expensive. Existing coordinate-pruning strategies rely on local error functions that can oversample correlated points and incur substantial overhead from full-grid error evaluation. We introduce Refined Grid Sampling (RGS), which combines stratified grid sampling, error-based refinement, and dynamic grid-resolution adjustment. This design reduces spatial redundancy without evaluating errors over the full grid. On high-resolution Navier--Stokes fields, RGS achieves higher reconstruction accuracy within a fixed wall-clock budget and reaches the accuracy of full-grid training up to $6\times$ faster than the evaluated baselines.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.14205 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.14205v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14205 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 199 words

Related coverage