Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research tackles hallucination in vision-language models by introducing a stage-wise preference optimization framework that targets specific failure modes like ambiguous spatial reasoning and OCR uncertainty. By constructing targeted multimodal data near known boundaries, the method leverages Direct Preference Optimization to better distinguish grounded reasoning from linguistically plausible but visually inconsistent outputs. The results indicate this approach can outperform frontier proprietary VLMs in maintaining visual grounding under adversarial conditions.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models via Stage-wise Preference Optimization under Distribution Shift

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.16411v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Hallucination remains a fundamental challenge in vision-language models (VLMs), where autoregressive generation may produce linguistically plausible yet physically inconsistent or visually ungrounded responses due to likelihood maximization under joint probabilistic modeling. We propose a stage-wise preference optimization framework for hallucination reduction through targeted multimodal data construction. Rather than directly optimizing on generic instruction-following data, our approach progressively constructs hallucination-focused preference pairs near known failure boundaries. The framework emphasizes ambiguous spatial orientation, object relationships, OCR uncertainty, and adversarial false-premise training. Hallucinated negatives are generated through minimally perturbed yet visually inconsistent alternatives, enabling Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to better separate grounded reasoning from plausible hallucination. Experiments on open-source benchmarks and real-world multimodal evaluation scenarios demonstrate improved grounding consistency, reduced hallucination, and more informative grounded responses. Cross-model qualitative evaluation further shows that the proposed multimodal LLM DPO framework produces more visually grounded responses than several frontier proprietary VLMs, such as in ambiguous spatial reasoning and adversarial false-premise settings. The results suggest that hallucination may arise not only from limited model capacity, but also from inherent tendencies of autoregressive probabilistic generation to favor linguistically plausible continuations under weak visual grounding. Future work may explore physical consistency modeling, uncertainty-aware multimodal reasoning, and architectural alternatives beyond standard autoregressive decoding.

Abstract:Hallucination remains a fundamental challenge in vision-language models (VLMs), where autoregressive generation may produce linguistically plausible yet physically inconsistent or visually ungrounded responses due to likelihood maximization under joint probabilistic modeling. We propose a stage-wise preference optimization framework for hallucination reduction through targeted multimodal data construction. Rather than directly optimizing on generic instruction-following data, our approach progressively constructs hallucination-focused preference pairs near known failure boundaries. The framework emphasizes ambiguous spatial orientation, object relationships, OCR uncertainty, and adversarial false-premise training. Hallucinated negatives are generated through minimally perturbed yet visually inconsistent alternatives, enabling Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to better separate grounded reasoning from plausible hallucination. Experiments on open-source benchmarks and real-world multimodal evaluation scenarios demonstrate improved grounding consistency, reduced hallucination, and more informative grounded responses. Cross-model qualitative evaluation further shows that the proposed multimodal LLM DPO framework produces more visually grounded responses than several frontier proprietary VLMs, such as in ambiguous spatial reasoning and adversarial false-premise settings. The results suggest that hallucination may arise not only from limited model capacity, but also from inherent tendencies of autoregressive probabilistic generation to favor linguistically plausible continuations under weak visual grounding. Future work may explore physical consistency modeling, uncertainty-aware multimodal reasoning, and architectural alternatives beyond standard autoregressive decoding.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Databases (cs.DB); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2605.16411 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.16411v2 [cs.CV] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 229 words

Related coverage