aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a functional generalization of Bell sampling to qudits (d-level systems), overcoming previous limitations where natural extensions failed for dimensions greater than two. By introducing a novel unitary construction based on Lagrange's four-square theorem, the authors enable efficient learning of stabilizer states and rigorous testing of quantum pseudorandomness across all relevant dimensions. These advances provide critical theoretical tools for analyzing magic measures and characterizing Clifford circuits in higher-dimensional quantum architectures.
Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more
arXiv:2510.06848v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Bell sampling is a simple yet powerful tool based on measuring two copies of a quantum state in the Bell basis, and has found applications in a plethora of problems related to stabiliser states and measures of magic. However, it was not known how to generalise the procedure from qubits to $d$-level systems -- qudits -- for all dimensions $d > 2$ in a useful way. Indeed, a prior work of the authors (arXiv'24) showed that the natural extension of Bell sampling to arbitrary dimensions fails to provide meaningful information about the quantum states being measured. In this paper, we overcome the difficulties encountered in previous works and develop a useful generalisation of Bell sampling to qudits of all $d\geq 2$. At the heart of our primitive is a new unitary, based on Lagrange's four-square theorem, that maps four copies of any stabiliser state $|\mathcal{S}\rangle$ to four copies of its complex conjugate $|\mathcal{S}^\ast\rangle$ (up to some Pauli operator), which may be of independent interest. We then demonstrate the utility of our new Bell sampling technique by lifting several known results from qubits to qudits for any $d\geq 2$: 1. Learning stabiliser states in $O(n^3)$ time with $O(n)$ samples; 2. Solving the Hidden Stabiliser Group Problem in $\tilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\tilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples; 3. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle$ has stabiliser size at least $d^t$ or is $\varepsilon$-far from all such states in $\tilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\tilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples; 4. Clifford circuits with at most $n/2$ single-qudit non-Clifford gates cannot prepare pseudorandom states; 5. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle$ has stabiliser fidelity at least $1-\varepsilon_1$ or at most $1-\varepsilon_2$ with $O(d^2\varepsilon_2/(\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1)^2)$ samples if $\varepsilon_1 = O(\varepsilon_2/d^{2})$.
Abstract:Bell sampling is a simple yet powerful tool based on measuring two copies of a quantum state in the Bell basis, and has found applications in a plethora of problems related to stabiliser states and measures of magic. However, it was not known how to generalise the procedure from qubits to $d$-level systems -- qudits -- for all dimensions $d > 2$ in a useful way. Indeed, a prior work of the authors (arXiv'24) showed that the natural extension of Bell sampling to arbitrary dimensions fails to provide meaningful information about the quantum states being measured. In this paper, we overcome the difficulties encountered in previous works and develop a useful generalisation of Bell sampling to qudits of all $d\geq 2$. At the heart of our primitive is a new unitary, based on Lagrange's four-square theorem, that maps four copies of any stabiliser state $|\mathcal{S}\rangle$ to four copies of its complex conjugate $|\mathcal{S}^\ast\rangle$ (up to some Pauli operator), which may be of independent interest. We then demonstrate the utility of our new Bell sampling technique by lifting several known results from qubits to qudits for any $d\geq 2$: 1. Learning stabiliser states in $O(n^3)$ time with $O(n)$ samples; 2. Solving the Hidden Stabiliser Group Problem in $\tilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\tilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples; 3. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle$ has stabiliser size at least $d^t$ or is $\varepsilon$-far from all such states in $\tilde{O}(n^3/\varepsilon)$ time with $\tilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ samples; 4. Clifford circuits with at most $n/2$ single-qudit non-Clifford gates cannot prepare pseudorandom states; 5. Testing whether $|\psi\rangle$ has stabiliser fidelity at least $1-\varepsilon_1$ or at most $1-\varepsilon_2$ with $O(d^2\varepsilon_2/(\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1)^2)$ samples if $\varepsilon_1 = O(\varepsilon_2/d^{2})$.
48 pages, 1 figure. v2: slightly improved results, some proofs and sections rewritten, references added and fixed; v3: a few sections completely rewritten, better stabiliser testing bounds, several typos and inconsistencies fixed
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2510.06848 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2510.06848v3 [quant-ph] for this version)
From: Joao F. Doriguello [view email] [v1] Wed, 8 Oct 2025 10:13:16 UTC (229 KB) [v2] Tue, 11 Nov 2025 21:28:47 UTC (215 KB) [v3] Tue, 25 Aug 2026 12:14:44 UTC (202 KB)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 356 words
Related coverage

Non-stabilizerness and violations of CHSH inequalities
Quantum Journal · Sep 21, 2026

Quantifying mixed-state entanglement via partial transpose and realignment moments
Quantum Journal · Aug 19, 2026

Researchers Learn Quantum States from Fewest Possible Copies
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 2, 2026
Adaptivity is all you need: Optimal stabilizer learning using just single-copy measurements
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026