Skip to content
Off-topic for aiqbench

Off-topic for aiqbench

This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.

Readiness Barrier Functions: Forward-Invariant Control Authority for Overactuated Multirotor Allocation

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.16335v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Allocation schemes that greedily maximize a readiness metric over the actuator fiber bundle of an overactuated multirotor produce commands that jump between disconnected optimal strata, demanding actuator rates no motor can deliver; effort-minimizing schemes are continuous but cannot guarantee that wrench-rate authority stays above any certified level. We reconcile the two by treating authority as a forward-invariant quantity: a control barrier function on the log-determinant of the drag-aware actuator-authority co-metric, enforced at torque level by a quadratic program in the allocation null space. A single design inequality renders the certified set compact and strictly interior to the actuator box, with the readiness cost of any rotor deactivation given in closed form as $\ln(n/(n{-}m))$ for symmetric designs. Tracking is sacrificed only through an explicit alignment ratio, with wrench error bounded by $\mathcal{O}(\rho^{-1/2})$ and a robust variant handles motor-parameter uncertainty with a closed-form floor shift independent of the airframe matrix. On a hexarotor and a fully-actuated octorotor the closed-form gap matches simulation to machine precision; in the authority-scarce regime greedy maximization violates the certified floor and commits wrench errors up to eighty times larger than the proposed filter, which holds invariance of the certified set at negligible tracking cost.

Abstract:Allocation schemes that greedily maximize a readiness metric over the actuator fiber bundle of an overactuated multirotor produce commands that jump between disconnected optimal strata, demanding actuator rates no motor can deliver; effort-minimizing schemes are continuous but cannot guarantee that wrench-rate authority stays above any certified level. We reconcile the two by treating authority as a forward-invariant quantity: a control barrier function on the log-determinant of the drag-aware actuator-authority co-metric, enforced at torque level by a quadratic program in the allocation null space. A single design inequality renders the certified set compact and strictly interior to the actuator box, with the readiness cost of any rotor deactivation given in closed form as $\ln(n/(n{-}m))$ for symmetric designs. Tracking is sacrificed only through an explicit alignment ratio, with wrench error bounded by $\mathcal{O}(\rho^{-1/2})$ and a robust variant handles motor-parameter uncertainty with a closed-form floor shift independent of the airframe matrix. On a hexarotor and a fully-actuated octorotor the closed-form gap matches simulation to machine precision; in the authority-scarce regime greedy maximization violates the certified floor and commits wrench errors up to eighty times larger than the proposed filter, which holds invariance of the certified set at negligible tracking cost.

Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2608.16335 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2608.16335v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16335 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 298 words

Related coverage