Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper challenges the standard 0-shot stability metric in continual learning by introducing few-shot evaluation to better capture a model's ability to retain information and adapt quickly. The authors demonstrate that incorporating "foresight" through meta-learning of future tasks induces effective learning-to-learn behaviors, offering novel insights into the performance of existing strategies. This shift in evaluation methodology provides a more realistic assessment of how models handle sequential task sequences without requiring perfect recall.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Re-Evaluating Continual Learning with Few-Shot Adaptation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.03843v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continual learning methods aim to maximize the stability and plasticity of machine learning models that are trained on a sequence of tasks. The standard measure of stability (i.e., forgetting) is the 0-shot performance of a model on previously learned tasks, and plasticity, the performance on the most recently learned task. However, 0-shot evaluation does not fully measure a model or method's ability to retain learned information or adapt quickly to new information, as it requires perfect recall across multiple tasks. In this paper, we propose few-shot evaluation as a more comprehensive assessment of the stability and plasticity of a continual learning system. We conduct a fine-grained assessment on task sequences for continual image classification and find that this paradigm produces novel insights into the performance of popular continual learning strategies. Through few-shot evaluation with a novel metric -- per-shot plasticity -- we show that adding `foresight' to continual learning methods via the meta-learning of a short sequence of future tasks induces learning-to-learn behavior over the task sequence.

Abstract:Continual learning methods aim to maximize the stability and plasticity of machine learning models that are trained on a sequence of tasks. The standard measure of stability (i.e., forgetting) is the 0-shot performance of a model on previously learned tasks, and plasticity, the performance on the most recently learned task. However, 0-shot evaluation does not fully measure a model or method's ability to retain learned information or adapt quickly to new information, as it requires perfect recall across multiple tasks. In this paper, we propose few-shot evaluation as a more comprehensive assessment of the stability and plasticity of a continual learning system. We conduct a fine-grained assessment on task sequences for continual image classification and find that this paradigm produces novel insights into the performance of popular continual learning strategies. Through few-shot evaluation with a novel metric -- per-shot plasticity -- we show that adding `foresight' to continual learning methods via the meta-learning of a short sequence of future tasks induces learning-to-learn behavior over the task sequence.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2606.03843 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.03843v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03843 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words

Related coverage