aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the reliability bottleneck in Code-as-Policy agents by introducing RE-0, a framework that recursively verifies teacher interventions before applying them as supervision. By filtering out unverified corrections from unreliable teachers and weighting improvements by their actual local benefit, the method ensures that only genuinely beneficial updates drive policy evolution. The approach successfully improves both assisted execution and standalone student performance across diverse embodied tasks without assuming global teacher superiority.
RE-0: Verified Recursive Improvement of Embodied Code-as-Policy Agents through Local On-Policy Distillation
arXiv:2609.32416v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Code-as-Policy agents accomplish long-horizon embodied tasks by generating and executing code, yet continually improving them with teachers that are stronger but not globally reliable remains a key challenge. Existing distillation methods typically treat the teacher's complete behavior as the supervision target and thus misassign training credit on states where the teacher fails. We propose RE-0, a recursively verified policy improvement framework: rather than assuming that the teacher globally outperforms the student, RE-0 requests local corrections from the teacher on the student's own failure histories and checks in the environment whether each correction is genuinely beneficial; verified corrections yield immediate improvement. Building on this, we propose RE-OPD, which turns verified interventions into supervision for on-policy distillation. Only counterfactually verified teacher interventions provide distribution-level supervision, weighted by their measured local benefit, and the improvement they induce is projected back into the standalone student, so both where supervision is applied and how much credit the teacher receives co-evolve with the student policy. We further prove that the student's per-round gain is lower-bounded by its verified intervention gain up to verification and projection error terms. Experiments across multiple Code-as-Policy embodied tasks show that RE-0 improves both teacher-assisted execution and the standalone student, and generalizes to novel robots and scenes.
Abstract:Code-as-Policy agents accomplish long-horizon embodied tasks by generating and executing code, yet continually improving them with teachers that are stronger but not globally reliable remains a key challenge. Existing distillation methods typically treat the teacher's complete behavior as the supervision target and thus misassign training credit on states where the teacher fails. We propose RE-0, a recursively verified policy improvement framework: rather than assuming that the teacher globally outperforms the student, RE-0 requests local corrections from the teacher on the student's own failure histories and checks in the environment whether each correction is genuinely beneficial; verified corrections yield immediate improvement. Building on this, we propose RE-OPD, which turns verified interventions into supervision for on-policy distillation. Only counterfactually verified teacher interventions provide distribution-level supervision, weighted by their measured local benefit, and the improvement they induce is projected back into the standalone student, so both where supervision is applied and how much credit the teacher receives co-evolve with the student policy. We further prove that the student's per-round gain is lower-bounded by its verified intervention gain up to verification and projection error terms. Experiments across multiple Code-as-Policy embodied tasks show that RE-0 improves both teacher-assisted execution and the standalone student, and generalizes to novel robots and scenes.
17 pages, 5 figures. Corresponding author: Hongzhou Wang (wanghongzhou@jlu.this http URL)
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.32416 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.32416v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32416 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 315 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · Sep 14, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Import AI 474: Platonic mindspace; TPUs in space; Zhipu starts an outer RSI loop
Import AI · Sep 28, 2026