Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

RCStat introduces a novel statistical framework for quantifying token influence in transformer attention mechanisms, addressing the entanglement of contextual relevance with softmax normalization effects. By estimating these influences at inference time without retraining, the method enables more accurate model attribution and efficient key-value cache eviction, directly enhancing both interpretability and computational efficiency for large language models.
Sources coveringarXiv, InfoQ
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

RCStat: A Statistical Framework for using Relative Contextualization in Transformers

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2506.19549v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Identifying which tokens and activations truly influence model predictions is critical for both the efficiency and interpretability of large auto-regressive language models. Yet in practice, token importance is typically inferred from attention distributions that entangle contextual relevance with softmax-normalization effects, obscuring relative influence across tokens and heads. We propose $\textbf{RCStat}$, a statistical framework for quantifying contextual influence in attention mechanisms. At its core $\textbf{Relative Contextualization (RC)}$ is a random variable that measures how strongly one subset of tokens contributes to another under the model's internal scoring scheme. RCStat admits computationally efficient bounds on expected influence that can be estimated at inference time. No retraining is required. We apply RCStat to two tasks. For $\textbf{attribution}$, attention heads with high expected RC accurately identify the prompt spans that drive generation, enabling reliable span-level explanations. For $\textbf{key-value cache eviction}$, RC-based adaptive thresholding selectively evicts low-impact KV entries, substantially reducing cache size while preserving generation quality. Across question answering, summarization, and attribution benchmarks, RCStat achieves consistent gains, improving generation quality by 15-40% with upto 36% error reduction for KV eviction, and attribution accuracy by 2-16%. These results demonstrate that explicitly modeling contextual influence provides a principled and practical alternative to attention-based heuristics.

Abstract:Identifying which tokens and activations truly influence model predictions is critical for both the efficiency and interpretability of large auto-regressive language models. Yet in practice, token importance is typically inferred from attention distributions that entangle contextual relevance with softmax-normalization effects, obscuring relative influence across tokens and heads. We propose $\textbf{RCStat}$, a statistical framework for quantifying contextual influence in attention mechanisms. At its core $\textbf{Relative Contextualization (RC)}$ is a random variable that measures how strongly one subset of tokens contributes to another under the model's internal scoring scheme. RCStat admits computationally efficient bounds on expected influence that can be estimated at inference time. No retraining is required. We apply RCStat to two tasks. For $\textbf{attribution}$, attention heads with high expected RC accurately identify the prompt spans that drive generation, enabling reliable span-level explanations. For $\textbf{key-value cache eviction}$, RC-based adaptive thresholding selectively evicts low-impact KV entries, substantially reducing cache size while preserving generation quality. Across question answering, summarization, and attribution benchmarks, RCStat achieves consistent gains, improving generation quality by 15-40% with upto 36% error reduction for KV eviction, and attribution accuracy by 2-16%. These results demonstrate that explicitly modeling contextual influence provides a principled and practical alternative to attention-based heuristics.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2506.19549 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2506.19549v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.19549 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words

Related coverage