Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This arXiv paper addresses a practical problem in voice agents: launching tools before a user finishes speaking saves time, but later self-corrections can make those early calls stale and irreversible. The proposed RASSG method pairs a launch rule (three consecutive identical speech recognition results) with a calibrated invalidity-risk and cancellation policy. Its reported gains (stale execution falling from 50% to 3.15% on one subset, at a mean delay of 3.676s) come from controlled simulations with fixed tool runtimes, so real-world latency and user-experience trade-offs remain untested.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

RASSG: Repair-Aware Semantic Survival Gating for Streaming Tool Execution

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.14659v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Streaming speech assistants can launch tools before users finish speaking, overlapping execution with incoming speech to reduce user waiting time. However, subsequent self-corrections can invalidate apparently stable arguments, causing stale execution whose irreversible effects persist even after the final call is corrected. We propose Repair-Aware Semantic Survival Gating (RASSG) to jointly control tool launch and cancellation during streaming speech. RASSG launches a tool when three consecutive speech recognition results arrive with identical nonempty arguments, then combines calibrated argument invalidity risk with execution costs to decide cancellation at the last feasible opportunity before effects become irreversible. Evaluation on ReCAST, FDB-v3, and Audio2Tool uses a controlled execution clock with fixed tool runtimes and cancellation parameters. On ReCAST's prospective-repair subset, RASSG reduces the stale execution rate from LocalAgreement-2's 50.00% to 3.15%, with a mean delay of 3.676s across successful trajectories. The stale reduction also holds against every early-execution baseline on both public speech datasets. Ablations with identical initial launches support active cancellation, showing the value of controlling ongoing calls before their effects become irreversible. Code and data are available at https://github.com/daijinhu/RASSG.

Abstract:Streaming speech assistants can launch tools before users finish speaking, overlapping execution with incoming speech to reduce user waiting time. However, subsequent self-corrections can invalidate apparently stable arguments, causing stale execution whose irreversible effects persist even after the final call is corrected. We propose Repair-Aware Semantic Survival Gating (RASSG) to jointly control tool launch and cancellation during streaming speech. RASSG launches a tool when three consecutive speech recognition results arrive with identical nonempty arguments, then combines calibrated argument invalidity risk with execution costs to decide cancellation at the last feasible opportunity before effects become irreversible. Evaluation on ReCAST, FDB-v3, and Audio2Tool uses a controlled execution clock with fixed tool runtimes and cancellation parameters. On ReCAST's prospective-repair subset, RASSG reduces the stale execution rate from LocalAgreement-2's 50.00% to 3.15%, with a mean delay of 3.676s across successful trajectories. The stale reduction also holds against every early-execution baseline on both public speech datasets. Ablations with identical initial launches support active cancellation, showing the value of controlling ongoing calls before their effects become irreversible. Code and data are available at this https URL.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.14659 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.14659v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14659 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words

Related coverage