aiqbench analysis
This research introduces RAPT, a lightweight monitoring system that detects out-of-distribution states in humanoid robots during Sim-to-Real deployment while maintaining high-frequency control requirements. By combining probabilistic trajectory modeling with LLM-based semantic reasoning, the method effectively localizes failure points and diagnoses causes without extensive retraining. The approach directly addresses critical safety challenges for deploying learned robotic policies by reducing silent hardware failures caused by distribution shifts between simulation and reality.
RAPT: Model-Predictive Out-of-Distribution Detection and Failure Diagnosis for Sim-to-Real Humanoid Deployment
arXiv:2602.01515v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deploying learned control policies is risky because policies that appear robust in simulation can confidently enter out-of-distribution (OOD) states after Sim-to-Real transfer, causing silent failures and potential hardware damage. Existing anomaly detectors often fail to meet the requirements of high-rate control, extremely low false-positive rates, and interpretable failure feedback. We present \textbf{RAPT} (Recurrent Anomaly Probabilistic Trajectory Model), a lightweight, self-supervised $50$\,Hz deployment monitor that learns nominal execution from large-scale simulation and produces calibrated, per-dimension predictive-deviation signals online. RAPT enables OOD detection under strict false-positive constraints while localizing \emph{when and where} real execution departs from nominal behavior. For post-hoc diagnosis, RAPT combines temporal saliency, joint-kinematic summaries, and LLM-based semantic reasoning to classify likely failure causes in a zero-shot setting. In simulation across four Isaac Lab tasks, RAPT improves TPR by $37\%$ over the strongest baseline at $0.5\%$ episode-level FPR; on hardware, it achieves $89\%$ TPR across $78$ trials with fewer false positives than high-frequency-compatible baselines, and reaches $75\%$ semantic failure diagnosis accuracy across $21$ categories on a challenging OOD subset. Project website, code, and videos: https://humphreymunn.github.io/RAPT/.
Abstract:Deploying learned control policies is risky because policies that appear robust in simulation can confidently enter out-of-distribution (OOD) states after Sim-to-Real transfer, causing silent failures and potential hardware damage. Existing anomaly detectors often fail to meet the requirements of high-rate control, extremely low false-positive rates, and interpretable failure feedback. We present \textbf{RAPT} (Recurrent Anomaly Probabilistic Trajectory Model), a lightweight, self-supervised $50$\,Hz deployment monitor that learns nominal execution from large-scale simulation and produces calibrated, per-dimension predictive-deviation signals online. RAPT enables OOD detection under strict false-positive constraints while localizing \emph{when and where} real execution departs from nominal behavior. For post-hoc diagnosis, RAPT combines temporal saliency, joint-kinematic summaries, and LLM-based semantic reasoning to classify likely failure causes in a zero-shot setting. In simulation across four Isaac Lab tasks, RAPT improves TPR by $37\%$ over the strongest baseline at $0.5\%$ episode-level FPR; on hardware, it achieves $89\%$ TPR across $78$ trials with fewer false positives than high-frequency-compatible baselines, and reaches $75\%$ semantic failure diagnosis accuracy across $21$ categories on a challenging OOD subset. Project website, code, and videos: this https URL.
Robotics (cs.RO); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2602.01515 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2602.01515v2 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.01515 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
supplementary.pdf
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words
Related coverage

Handling Imbalanced Classification: What Works Better Than SMOTE
Analytics Vidhya · Jul 12, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026

Introducing CARE-X: Towards Clinically Useful Radiology VLMs with Auxiliary Supervision, Reward-Aligned Learning, and Tool-Augmented Measurement
Microsoft Research · Aug 11, 2026