aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a critical security vulnerability in LLM-based listwise recommenders where the arbitrary ordering of candidate items creates an exploitable attack surface, allowing adversaries to manipulate rankings without altering model parameters or content. The study quantifies this risk through $\mathrm{promo}@k$ metrics and demonstrates that architectural changes like permutation-consistency regularization can effectively mitigate order sensitivity while maintaining ranking quality. These findings are essential for securing recommendation pipelines against injection attacks that rely on input serialization artifacts rather than prompt poisoning alone.
Ranked by Position: Order Sensitivity as an Exploitable Attack Surface in LLM Listwise Recommenders
arXiv:2607.24869v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) used as listwise rerankers in recommendation systems suffer from position bias when serializing candidate sets into prompts. We show this order sensitivity creates an exploitable attack surface: an attacker can promote a label-0 target into the top-$k$ solely by reordering candidates, without changing item content, labels, or model parameters. We introduce $\mathrm{promo}@k$ to quantify this vulnerability, measuring the fraction of label-0 targets that can be elevated into top-$k$ rankings via permutation. Evaluating across three domains (MovieLens, Amazon Books, and Amazon Fashion), $\mathrm{promo}@5$ reaches up to 0.57 at an attack budget of $R$ = 50 orderings. Furthermore, ordinary permutation stability predicts vulnerability without running the attack. While a bidirectional T5 encoder scorer reduces exposure, permutation-consistency regularization and architectural invariance effectively mitigate it. Pointwise scoring avoids the bias issue but degrades ranking quality. These results demonstrate that input candidate order in listwise LLM reranking is a security-relevant attack vector. Code and data are available at https://github.com/geoz-lab/position_bias_attack.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) used as listwise rerankers in recommendation systems suffer from position bias when serializing candidate sets into prompts. We show this order sensitivity creates an exploitable attack surface: an attacker can promote a label-0 target into the top-$k$ solely by reordering candidates, without changing item content, labels, or model parameters. We introduce $\mathrm{promo}@k$ to quantify this vulnerability, measuring the fraction of label-0 targets that can be elevated into top-$k$ rankings via permutation. Evaluating across three domains (MovieLens, Amazon Books, and Amazon Fashion), $\mathrm{promo}@5$ reaches up to 0.57 at an attack budget of $R$ = 50 orderings. Furthermore, ordinary permutation stability predicts vulnerability without running the attack. While a bidirectional T5 encoder scorer reduces exposure, permutation-consistency regularization and architectural invariance effectively mitigate it. Pointwise scoring avoids the bias issue but degrades ranking quality. These results demonstrate that input candidate order in listwise LLM reranking is a security-relevant attack vector. Code and data are available at this https URL.
13 pages, 6 figures, 11 tables. Code and data available at this https URL
Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.24869 [cs.IR]
(or arXiv:2607.24869v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24869 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Netskope (NTSK) Q2 2027 Earnings Call Transcript
fool.com · Sep 10, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
.webp%3Fssl%3D1&w=320)
Top 50 Best Penetration Testing Companies in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Jul 31, 2026