aiqbench analysis
This paper resolves a significant open problem in quantum complexity by proving the impossibility of efficiently synthesizing Haar random unitaries using classical function evaluations in superposition. The authors establish a superpolynomial query lower bound for this task while simultaneously constructing an improved $O(N)$-design, surpassing previous $\sqrt{N}$ limits within the ROM-PRU model. These findings clarify fundamental constraints on scalable pseudorandom unitary generation and their relationship to classical oracle access.
Random-Oracle Unitary Synthesis is Impossible
arXiv:2610.06700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A major open problem in quantum complexity is the question of unitary synthesis---namely, is it possible to efficiently implement any unitary, given the ability to evaluate any classical function in superposition? Inspired by a recent work by Brakerski and Yuen (CRYPTO 2026), we propose an ``average-case'' unitary synthesis problem, which asks whether it is possible to efficiently implement a Haar random unitary given access to a random Boolean function. We then demonstrate a superpolynomial query lower bound, establishing that unitary synthesis in this model is impossible. Along with our main result, we settle in the negative a question Brakerski and Yuen pose, of whether scalable pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) can be implemented in the ROM-PRU model. In particular, we show that in the ROM-PRU model, no $\Omega(N^{1+\gamma})$ unitary design on $n$ qubits, where $N=2^n$, can be efficiently achieved for any $\gamma > 0$. On the other hand, we construct an $O(N)$-design in $\text{poly}(n)$ queries in the same model, surpassing the previously best known results which constructed $O(\sqrt{N})$-designs.
Abstract:A major open problem in quantum complexity is the question of unitary synthesis---namely, is it possible to efficiently implement any unitary, given the ability to evaluate any classical function in superposition? Inspired by a recent work by Brakerski and Yuen (CRYPTO 2026), we propose an ``average-case'' unitary synthesis problem, which asks whether it is possible to efficiently implement a Haar random unitary given access to a random Boolean function. We then demonstrate a superpolynomial query lower bound, establishing that unitary synthesis in this model is impossible. Along with our main result, we settle in the negative a question Brakerski and Yuen pose, of whether scalable pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) can be implemented in the ROM-PRU model. In particular, we show that in the ROM-PRU model, no $\Omega(N^{1+\gamma})$ unitary design on $n$ qubits, where $N=2^n$, can be efficiently achieved for any $\gamma > 0$. On the other hand, we construct an $O(N)$-design in $\text{poly}(n)$ queries in the same model, surpassing the previously best known results which constructed $O(\sqrt{N})$-designs.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
arXiv:2610.06700 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.06700v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06700 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 263 words
Related coverage
Explicit Separations for One-Query Unitary Synthesis
arXiv · Jul 30, 2026
Time-space lower bounds for breaking quantum cryptography
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026
Quantum Lazy Sampling and Path Recording for Any Group
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026

Researchers Cut Circuit Complexity Using sqrt(T) Gates
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 23, 2026