aiqbench analysis
This paper extends the Wigner's friend thought experiment to challenge the absoluteness of free choices under locality constraints, utilizing the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem within a quantum information framework. By rigorously analyzing observer consistency in sealed lab scenarios, the work probes fundamental limits of quantum theory rather than offering immediate applications for current AI systems or quantum hardware.
Questioning the absoluteness of free choices when internalized in Wigner's friend scenarios
arXiv:2605.14538v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Wigner's thought experiment illustrates quantum theory's measurement problem by considering an observer who measures a quantum system inside a sealed lab, modeled unitarily by an outsider. Recent extensions of this thought experiment, referred to as extended Wigner's friend arguments, question how different observers can reason consistently about each other in quantum setups, and challenge the absoluteness of the outcome value obtained by the friend under a notion of locality. In this work, we present an argument against the absoluteness of free choices under the same notion of locality, using an extended Wigner's friend scenario based on the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph theorem. Similar arguments based on other contextuality or nonlocality models are possible.
Abstract:Wigner's thought experiment illustrates quantum theory's measurement problem by considering an observer who measures a quantum system inside a sealed lab, modeled unitarily by an outsider. Recent extensions of this thought experiment, referred to as extended Wigner's friend arguments, question how different observers can reason consistently about each other in quantum setups, and challenge the absoluteness of the outcome value obtained by the friend under a notion of locality. In this work, we present an argument against the absoluteness of free choices under the same notion of locality, using an extended Wigner's friend scenario based on the Pusey--Barrett--Rudolph theorem. Similar arguments based on other contextuality or nonlocality models are possible.
Close to published version now; updated title according to published version in Phys. Rev. A. 7+2 pages, all comments welcome!
arXiv:2605.14538 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2605.14538v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.14538 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Phys. Rev. A 114, 032431 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1103/hf5j-t83v Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 235 words
Related coverage

The SaaSpocalypse that wasn’t, with Atlassian CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes
The Verge · Sep 28, 2026

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · Sep 21, 2026

How GoFundMe became America’s backup plan
The Verge · Aug 24, 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026