aiqbench analysis
Query Lens advances sparse feature interpretability by extending Logit Lens to capture both direct activations and indirect, module-mediated effects, resolving cases where standard methods fail to produce coherent signatures. The proposed Subspace Channel Hypothesis offers a theoretical framework suggesting downstream modules access these features through layer-specific subspaces, providing a more faithful characterization of internal model mechanics. This work is particularly relevant for researchers seeking deeper insights into the representational capacity and transparency of sparse autoencoders in large language models.
Query Lens: Interpreting Sparse Key-Value Features with Indirect Effects
arXiv:2606.07617v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While sparse autoencoders provide features more interpretable than individual neurons, reliably characterizing them remains challenging. We propose Query Lens, which extends Logit Lens to enable more comprehensive and faithful interpretations of sparse features. By jointly considering encoder-side key features and decoder-side value features, we identify both the inputs that activate a feature and the outputs it promotes. We also account for indirect, module-mediated effects that arise when the feature is processed by downstream modules, going beyond the direct effect captured by Logit Lens. In experiments, we find that Query Lens yields coherent token signatures for features that remain uninterpretable under Logit Lens. Finally, we propose the Subspace Channel Hypothesis, suggesting that downstream modules read features through layer-specific subspaces.
Abstract:While sparse autoencoders provide features more interpretable than individual neurons, reliably characterizing them remains challenging. We propose Query Lens, which extends Logit Lens to enable more comprehensive and faithful interpretations of sparse features. By jointly considering encoder-side key features and decoder-side value features, we identify both the inputs that activate a feature and the outputs it promotes. We also account for indirect, module-mediated effects that arise when the feature is processed by downstream modules, going beyond the direct effect captured by Logit Lens. In experiments, we find that Query Lens yields coherent token signatures for features that remain uninterpretable under Logit Lens. Finally, we propose the Subspace Channel Hypothesis, suggesting that downstream modules read features through layer-specific subspaces.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.07617 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.07617v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07617 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 215 words
Related coverage

The Model Organism Lottery: Model Organism Interpretability Strongly Depends on Training Methodology
LessWrong · Jul 23, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

How do neural networks regress cubic polynomials? Apparently, they use a trick invented in Milan 500 years ago
LessWrong · Jul 22, 2026
Dropless MoE Training in JAX with Primus-Turbo
AMD · Jun 10, 2026