aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a significant exponential separation between quantum and classical query complexities for maximizing non-negative submodular functions, demonstrating that quantum algorithms can achieve superior approximations with logarithmic queries where classical methods require linear scaling. The study also delineates specific approximation thresholds beyond which these quantum advantages vanish, providing rigorous lower bounds that define the limits of speedup in this optimization domain.
Quantum Submodular Maximization
arXiv:2610.04560v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the quantum query complexity of maximizing a non-negative submodular function, considering both the unconstrained setting and, for monotone functions, a cardinality constraint $k$ on an $n$-element ground set. In the exact reversible digital value-oracle model, our unconstrained algorithm achieves an expected $(1/2-\varepsilon)$-approximation using only $O_\varepsilon(\log n)$ queries. In contrast, any classical randomized algorithm that attains a fixed expected ratio above $1/4$ requires $\Omega(n/\log n)$ queries (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022), establishing an exponential separation in query complexity. For cardinality-constrained maximization, we give a bounded-error quantum algorithm that achieves a $(1-1/e-\varepsilon)$-approximation using $\widetilde O_\varepsilon(\min\{\sqrt n,n/k\})$ queries. When $k=o(n)$, our algorithm achieves at least a quadratic speedup up to logarithmic factors over classical randomized algorithms (Mirzasoleiman, Badanidiyuru, Karbasi, Vondr\'ak, and Krause, 2015; Peng and Rubinstein, 2025). Moreover, when $k=cn$ for any fixed rational $c<1-1/e-\varepsilon$, the query complexity reduces to $O_{\varepsilon,c}(\log n)$, yielding an exponential separation from the classical $\Omega(n/\log n)$ lower bound (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022). We further prove quantum lower bounds of $\exp(\Omega(\varepsilon^2n))$ queries for achieving a ratio beyond $1/2+\varepsilon$ without constraints, and $\exp(\Omega(\varepsilon^2k))$ queries for exceeding $1-1/e+\varepsilon$ when $k/n\le\varepsilon$. These barriers demonstrate that quantum computation offers no exponential speedup at these approximation thresholds.
Abstract:We study the quantum query complexity of maximizing a non-negative submodular function, considering both the unconstrained setting and, for monotone functions, a cardinality constraint $k$ on an $n$-element ground set. In the exact reversible digital value-oracle model, our unconstrained algorithm achieves an expected $(1/2-\varepsilon)$-approximation using only $O_\varepsilon(\log n)$ queries. In contrast, any classical randomized algorithm that attains a fixed expected ratio above $1/4$ requires $\Omega(n/\log n)$ queries (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022), establishing an exponential separation in query complexity. For cardinality-constrained maximization, we give a bounded-error quantum algorithm that achieves a $(1-1/e-\varepsilon)$-approximation using $\widetilde O_\varepsilon(\min\{\sqrt n,n/k\})$ queries. When $k=o(n)$, our algorithm achieves at least a quadratic speedup up to logarithmic factors over classical randomized algorithms (Mirzasoleiman, Badanidiyuru, Karbasi, Vondrák, and Krause, 2015; Peng and Rubinstein, 2025). Moreover, when $k=cn$ for any fixed rational $c<1-1/e-\varepsilon$, the query complexity reduces to $O_{\varepsilon,c}(\log n)$, yielding an exponential separation from the classical $\Omega(n/\log n)$ lower bound (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022). We further prove quantum lower bounds of $\exp(\Omega(\varepsilon^2n))$ queries for achieving a ratio beyond $1/2+\varepsilon$ without constraints, and $\exp(\Omega(\varepsilon^2k))$ queries for exceeding $1-1/e+\varepsilon$ when $k/n\le\varepsilon$. These barriers demonstrate that quantum computation offers no exponential speedup at these approximation thresholds.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
arXiv:2610.04560 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.04560v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04560 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 300 words
Related coverage
Classical, quantum, and general probabilistic state-discrimination profiles
arXiv · Sep 17, 2026

Kicked-Ising Model Achieves Maximal Quantum Battery Charging
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 30, 2026

Quemix Achieves Efficient Task Allocation in Quantum Simulations
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 2, 2026

University of Alabama Study Finds Qutrit Magic Tightens Bound to 1.561
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 15, 2026