Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI + Quantum

aiqbench analysis

This research proposes QRLQ, a scheduling framework that combines parameterized quantum circuits with deep reinforcement learning to optimize cost and delay in heterogeneous quantum cloud environments. The approach demonstrates significant efficiency gains over classical baselines by reducing trainable parameters while maintaining high execution fidelity, highlighting the practical utility of hybrid AI-quantum methods for resource management.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Quantum Reinforcement Learning for Cost and Delay Tradeoffs in Quantum Cloud Orchestration

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.27446v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum cloud computing, delivered through the quantum-as-a-service (QaaS) model, provides access to quantum computing resources. However, applying uniform time-based pricing across fundamentally heterogeneous quantum resources significantly complicates task orchestration, particularly when addressing the tradeoff between execution costs and system performance. While heuristic methods rely on predefined scheduling rules, classical deep reinforcement learning (DRL) models may require more trainable parameters in this setting. Motivated by the potential of parameterised quantum circuits (PQCs) as compact function approximators, we propose QRLQ, a cost-delay-aware quantum cloud scheduling framework integrating PQCs with a dueling double deep Q-network (D3QN) to dynamically account for both cost and delay. Our simulation results show that QRLQ achieves lower mean cost and delay than the heuristic baselines, achieving a 5-11% lower mean cost relative to availability-based and rotation-based heuristics and reducing mean delay by 17% and 82% relative to the strongest and weakest heuristic baselines, respectively, while retaining execution fidelity within 2% of a fidelity-greedy policy. Compared with the classical DRL baseline, QRLQ achieves comparable scheduling performance while using 72% fewer trainable parameters. This work explores the feasibility of using QRL for task orchestration in quantum cloud environments and demonstrates its potential for cost-delay-aware quantum resource management.

Abstract:Quantum cloud computing, delivered through the quantum-as-a-service (QaaS) model, provides access to quantum computing resources. However, applying uniform time-based pricing across fundamentally heterogeneous quantum resources significantly complicates task orchestration, particularly when addressing the tradeoff between execution costs and system performance. While heuristic methods rely on predefined scheduling rules, classical deep reinforcement learning (DRL) models may require more trainable parameters in this setting. Motivated by the potential of parameterised quantum circuits (PQCs) as compact function approximators, we propose QRLQ, a cost-delay-aware quantum cloud scheduling framework integrating PQCs with a dueling double deep Q-network (D3QN) to dynamically account for both cost and delay. Our simulation results show that QRLQ achieves lower mean cost and delay than the heuristic baselines, achieving a 5-11% lower mean cost relative to availability-based and rotation-based heuristics and reducing mean delay by 17% and 82% relative to the strongest and weakest heuristic baselines, respectively, while retaining execution fidelity within 2% of a fidelity-greedy policy. Compared with the classical DRL baseline, QRLQ achieves comparable scheduling performance while using 72% fewer trainable parameters. This work explores the feasibility of using QRL for task orchestration in quantum cloud environments and demonstrates its potential for cost-delay-aware quantum resource management.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

arXiv:2609.27446 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.27446v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27446 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 230 words

Related coverage